OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of patient-controlled abdominal compression on postural changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH). Secondary variables included subject assessments of their preferences and the ease-of-use. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTING: Clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with neurogenic OH (N=13). INTERVENTIONS:Four maneuvers were performed: moving from supine to standing without abdominal compression; moving from supine to standing with either a conventional or an adjustable abdominal binder in place; application of subject-determined maximal tolerable abdominal compression while standing; and while still erect, subsequent reduction of abdominal compression to a level the subject believed would be tolerable for a prolonged period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable included postural changes in SBP. Secondary outcome variables included subject assessments of their preferences and ease of use. RESULTS:Baseline median SBP in the supine position was not affected by mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising (without abdominal compression: 146mmHg; interquartile range, 124-164mmHg; with the conventional binder: 145mmHg; interquartile range, 129-167mmHg; with the adjustable binder: 153mmHg, interquartile range, 129-160mmHg; P=.85). Standing without a binder was associated with an -57mmHg (interquartile range, -40 to -76mmHg) SBP decrease. Levels of compression of 10mmHg applied prior to rising with the conventional and adjustable binders blunted these drops to -50mmHg (interquartile range, -33 to -70mmHg; P=.03) and -46mmHg (interquartile range, -34 to -75mmHg; P=.01), respectively. Increasing compression to subject-selected maximal tolerance while standing did not provide additional benefit and was associated with drops of -53mmHg (interquartile range, -26 to -71mmHg; P=.64) and -59mmHg (interquartile range, -49 to -76mmHg; P=.52) for the conventional and adjustable binders, respectively. Subsequent reduction of compression to more tolerable levels tended to worsen OH with both the conventional (-61mmHg; interquartile range, -33 to -80mmHg; P=.64) and adjustable (-67mmHg; interquartile range, -61 to -84mmHg; P=.79) binders. Subjects reported no differences in preferences between the binders in terms of preference or ease of use. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising can ameliorate OH, but further compression once standing does not result in additional benefit.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of patient-controlled abdominal compression on postural changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH). Secondary variables included subject assessments of their preferences and the ease-of-use. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTING: Clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with neurogenic OH (N=13). INTERVENTIONS: Four maneuvers were performed: moving from supine to standing without abdominal compression; moving from supine to standing with either a conventional or an adjustable abdominal binder in place; application of subject-determined maximal tolerable abdominal compression while standing; and while still erect, subsequent reduction of abdominal compression to a level the subject believed would be tolerable for a prolonged period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable included postural changes in SBP. Secondary outcome variables included subject assessments of their preferences and ease of use. RESULTS: Baseline median SBP in the supine position was not affected by mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising (without abdominal compression: 146mmHg; interquartile range, 124-164mmHg; with the conventional binder: 145mmHg; interquartile range, 129-167mmHg; with the adjustable binder: 153mmHg, interquartile range, 129-160mmHg; P=.85). Standing without a binder was associated with an -57mmHg (interquartile range, -40 to -76mmHg) SBP decrease. Levels of compression of 10mmHg applied prior to rising with the conventional and adjustable binders blunted these drops to -50mmHg (interquartile range, -33 to -70mmHg; P=.03) and -46mmHg (interquartile range, -34 to -75mmHg; P=.01), respectively. Increasing compression to subject-selected maximal tolerance while standing did not provide additional benefit and was associated with drops of -53mmHg (interquartile range, -26 to -71mmHg; P=.64) and -59mmHg (interquartile range, -49 to -76mmHg; P=.52) for the conventional and adjustable binders, respectively. Subsequent reduction of compression to more tolerable levels tended to worsen OH with both the conventional (-61mmHg; interquartile range, -33 to -80mmHg; P=.64) and adjustable (-67mmHg; interquartile range, -61 to -84mmHg; P=.79) binders. Subjects reported no differences in preferences between the binders in terms of preference or ease of use. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising can ameliorate OH, but further compression once standing does not result in additional benefit.
Authors: Adrianus A J Smit; Wouter Wieling; Jiro Fujimura; Jong C Denq; Tonette L Opfer-Gehrking; Mohammed Akarriou; John M Karemaker; Phillip A Low Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Luis E Okamoto; André Diedrich; Franz J Baudenbacher; René Harder; Jonathan S Whitfield; Fahad Iqbal; Alfredo Gamboa; Cyndya A Shibao; Bonnie K Black; Satish R Raj; David Robertson; Italo Biaggioni Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Emily C Smith; André Diedrich; Satish R Raj; Alfredo Gamboa; Cyndya A Shibao; Bonnie K Black; Amanda Peltier; Sachin Y Paranjape; Italo Biaggioni; Luis E Okamoto Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 5.501