Jennifer S Brach1, Kristin Lowry2, Subashan Perera3, Victoria Hornyak4, David Wert4, Stephanie A Studenski5, Jessie M VanSwearingen4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: jbrach@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Longitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the proposed mechanism of action of a task-specific motor learning intervention by examining its effect on measures of the motor control of gait. DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=40) aged ≥65 years with gait speed >1.0m/s and impaired motor skill (figure-of-8 walk time >8s). INTERVENTIONS: The 2 interventions included a task-oriented motor learning and a standard exercise program; both interventions included strength training. Both lasted 12 weeks, with twice-weekly, 1-hour, physical therapist-supervised sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two measures of the motor control of gait, gait variability and smoothness of walking, were assessed pre- and postintervention by assessors masked to the treatment arm. RESULTS: Of 40 randomized subjects, 38 completed the trial (mean age ± SD, 77.1±6.0y). The motor learning group improved more than the standard group in double-support time variability (.13m/s vs .05m/s; adjusted difference [AD]=.006, P=.03). Smoothness of walking in the anteroposterior direction improved more in the motor learning than standard group for all conditions (usual: AD=.53, P=.05; narrow: AD=.56, P=.01; dual task: AD=.57, P=.04). Smoothness of walking in the vertical direction also improved more in the motor learning than standard group for the narrow-path (AD=.71, P=.01) and dual-task (AD=.89, P=.01) conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with subclinical walking difficulty, there is initial evidence that task-oriented motor learning exercise results in gains in the motor control of walking, while standard exercise does not. Task-oriented motor learning exercise is a promising intervention for improving timing and coordination deficits related to mobility difficulties in older adults, and needs to be evaluated in a definitive larger trial.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the proposed mechanism of action of a task-specific motor learning intervention by examining its effect on measures of the motor control of gait. DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=40) aged ≥65 years with gait speed >1.0m/s and impaired motor skill (figure-of-8 walk time >8s). INTERVENTIONS: The 2 interventions included a task-oriented motor learning and a standard exercise program; both interventions included strength training. Both lasted 12 weeks, with twice-weekly, 1-hour, physical therapist-supervised sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two measures of the motor control of gait, gait variability and smoothness of walking, were assessed pre- and postintervention by assessors masked to the treatment arm. RESULTS: Of 40 randomized subjects, 38 completed the trial (mean age ± SD, 77.1±6.0y). The motor learning group improved more than the standard group in double-support time variability (.13m/s vs .05m/s; adjusted difference [AD]=.006, P=.03). Smoothness of walking in the anteroposterior direction improved more in the motor learning than standard group for all conditions (usual: AD=.53, P=.05; narrow: AD=.56, P=.01; dual task: AD=.57, P=.04). Smoothness of walking in the vertical direction also improved more in the motor learning than standard group for the narrow-path (AD=.71, P=.01) and dual-task (AD=.89, P=.01) conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with subclinical walking difficulty, there is initial evidence that task-oriented motor learning exercise results in gains in the motor control of walking, while standard exercise does not. Task-oriented motor learning exercise is a promising intervention for improving timing and coordination deficits related to mobility difficulties in older adults, and needs to be evaluated in a definitive larger trial.
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Elizabeth S Hile; David M Wert; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2011-10-14
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Jessie M Van Swearingen; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Sandra Gilmore; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Deborah Brodine; David Wert; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Edmund Ricci Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Alexandra Gil; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Andrea Kriska; Rakie Cham; Subashan Perera Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Peter C Coyle; Jenifer M Pugliese; J Megan Sions; Mark S Eskander; Jennifer A Schrack; Gregory E Hicks Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: John R Best; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Andrea L Metti; Andrea L Rosso; Suzanne Satterfield; Stephanie Studenski; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Laura L Bischoff; Thomas Cordes; Charlotte Meixner; Daniel Schoene; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Bettina Wollesen Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Sandra Gilmore; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Deborah Brodine; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Edmund Ricci Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Eric G James; Suzanne G Leveille; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Thomas Travison; David N Kennedy; Katherine L Tucker; Soham Al Snih; Kyriakos S Markides; Jonathan F Bean Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.053