Andrea Yeo1, Namita Kendall2, Sunderarajan Jayaraman2. 1. St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK. andreayeo@doctors.org.uk. 2. St Richard's Hospital, Spitalfield Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 6SE, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse injury. There are several modalities of treatment, reflecting difficulties in management. In particular, due to the well-recognised surgical morbidity, treatment has steered towards less invasive routes. Previous studies have targeted pathology either inside or outside the tendon in isolation with varying results. This study aimed to target both pathological sites by combining dry needling with percutaneous hydrostatic decompression as a novel treatment. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with 26 chronic, non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasound-guided dry needling of neovascular areas and small-volume hydrostatic paratenon decompression was performed 6-weekly. Sonographic assessment of tendon thickness and neovascularity was undertaken. Following treatment, a standardised physiotherapy regime was adopted. Visual analogue scores (VAS) were used as the primary outcome measure. Telephonic interviews were carried out 12 and 24 months post-treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four tendons (in 19 patients) were successfully treated. The mean treatment session was 2. There was no significant change in neovascularity or tendon thickness. Therapeutic intervention led to a significant improvement in VAS at rest (42.4 ± 24.4 vs. 18.4 ± 26.0, p = 0.0005) and during activity (72.8 ± 16.0 vs. 33.7 ± 23.2, p < 0.0001). At 12 and 24 months, >75 % of patients were highly satisfied with their outcome with nearly half reporting complete resolution of their symptoms. >85 % were also able to return to their sporting interests. CONCLUSION: Combined therapy of dry needling with percutaneous hydrostatic paratenon decompression under ultrasound guidance is a well-tolerated procedure with good short- and long-term pain and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.
PURPOSE: Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse injury. There are several modalities of treatment, reflecting difficulties in management. In particular, due to the well-recognised surgical morbidity, treatment has steered towards less invasive routes. Previous studies have targeted pathology either inside or outside the tendon in isolation with varying results. This study aimed to target both pathological sites by combining dry needling with percutaneous hydrostatic decompression as a novel treatment. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with 26 chronic, non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasound-guided dry needling of neovascular areas and small-volume hydrostatic paratenon decompression was performed 6-weekly. Sonographic assessment of tendon thickness and neovascularity was undertaken. Following treatment, a standardised physiotherapy regime was adopted. Visual analogue scores (VAS) were used as the primary outcome measure. Telephonic interviews were carried out 12 and 24 months post-treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four tendons (in 19 patients) were successfully treated. The mean treatment session was 2. There was no significant change in neovascularity or tendon thickness. Therapeutic intervention led to a significant improvement in VAS at rest (42.4 ± 24.4 vs. 18.4 ± 26.0, p = 0.0005) and during activity (72.8 ± 16.0 vs. 33.7 ± 23.2, p < 0.0001). At 12 and 24 months, >75 % of patients were highly satisfied with their outcome with nearly half reporting complete resolution of their symptoms. >85 % were also able to return to their sporting interests. CONCLUSION: Combined therapy of dry needling with percutaneous hydrostatic paratenon decompression under ultrasound guidance is a well-tolerated procedure with good short- and long-term pain and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.
Authors: J M Robinson; J L Cook; C Purdam; P J Visentini; J Ross; N Maffulli; J E Taunton; K M Khan Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Steven L J James; Kaline Ali; Chris Pocock; Claire Robertson; Joy Walter; Jonathan Bell; David Connell Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Robert J de Vos; Adam Weir; Hans T M van Schie; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans; Johannes L Tol Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anne M Boonstra; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; Michiel F Reneman; Jitze B Posthumus; Roy E Stewart Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: David A Connell; Kaline E Ali; Muaaze Ahmad; Simon Lambert; Steven Corbett; Mark Curtis Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2006-03-22 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Thomas G Sutlive; Andrew Golden; Kristin King; William B Morris; John E Morrison; Josef H Moore; Shane Koppenhaver Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2018-06
Authors: Eleuterio A Sánchez Romero; Joel Pollet; Sebastián Martín Pérez; José Luis Alonso Pérez; Alberto Carlos Muñoz Fernández; Paolo Pedersini; Carlos Barragán Carballar; Jorge Hugo Villafañe Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 2.430