Literature DB >> 25448097

Influenza vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed influenza in Greece during the 2013-2014 season: a test-negative study.

Theodore Lytras1, Athanasios Kossyvakis2, Angeliki Melidou3, Maria Exindari3, Georgia Gioula3, Vasiliki Pogka3, Nikolaos Malisiovas3, Andreas Mentis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2013-2014 Greece experienced a resurgence of severe influenza cases, coincidental with a shift to H1N1pdm09 predominance. We sought to estimate Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) for this season using available surveillance data from hospitals (including both inpatients and outpatients).
METHODS: Swab samples were sent by hospital physicians to one of three laboratories, covering the entire country, to be tested for influenza using RT-PCR. The test-negative design was employed, with patients testing positive serving as cases and those testing negative serving as controls. VE was estimated using logistic regression, adjusted for age group, sex, region and calendar time, with further adjustment for unknown vaccination status using inverse response propensity weights. Additional age group stratified estimates and subgroup estimates of VE against H1N1pdm09 and H3N2 were calculated.
RESULTS: Out of 1310 patients with known vaccination status, 124 (9.5%) were vaccinated, and 543 patients (41.5%) tested positive for influenza. Adjusted VE was 34.5% (95% CI: 4.1-55.3%) against any influenza, and 56.7% (95% CI: 22.8-75.7%) against H1N1pdm09. VE estimates appeared to be higher for people aged 60 and older, while in those under 60 there was limited evidence of effectiveness. Isolated circulating strains were genetically close to the vaccine strain, with limited evidence of antigenic drift.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a moderate protective effect of the 2013-2014 influenza vaccine, mainly against H1N1pdm09 and in people aged 60 and over. Vaccine coverage was very low in Greece, even among groups targeted for vaccination, and substantial efforts should be made to improve it. VE can and should be routinely monitored, and the results taken into account when deciding on influenza vaccine composition for next season.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Influenza; Influenza-like illness—ILI; Molecular methods; Surveillance; Vaccine effectiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448097     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Methodology.

Authors:  Huiying Chua; Shuo Feng; Joseph A Lewnard; Sheena G Sullivan; Christopher C Blyth; Marc Lipsitch; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Moderate influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus and low effectiveness against A(H3N2) virus among older adults during 2013-2014 influenza season in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Yang Pan; Chunna Ma; Wei Duan; Ying Sun; Shuangsheng Wu; Man Zhang; Yi Tian; Yang Zheng; Peng Yang; Quanyi Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Pooled influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates for Australia, 2012-2014.

Authors:  S G Sullivan; K S Carville; M Chilver; J E Fielding; K A Grant; H Kelly; A Levy; N P Stocks; S S Tempone; A K Regan
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.434

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.