Literature DB >> 25447961

The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term.

Asma A Khalil1, José Morales-Rosello2, Malaz Elsaddig2, Naila Khan2, Aris Papageorghiou2, Amar Bhide2, Basky Thilaganathan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fetal cerebroplacental ratio is emerging as a better proxy than birthweight for placental insufficiency and as a marker of fetal compromise at term. The extent to which these fetal Doppler changes are related to neonatal outcomes has not been systematically assessed. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the association between estimated fetal weight percentile, cerebroplacental ratio recorded at 34(+0)-35(+6) weeks' gestation, and neonatal unit admission at term. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center over an 11 year period from 2002 to 2012. The umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery PI, and cerebroplacental ratio were recorded at 34(+0)-35(+6) weeks. Weight values were converted into percentiles and Doppler parameters into multiples of the median (MoM), adjusting for gestational age. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify, and adjust for, potential confounders.
RESULTS: We identified 2518 pregnancies in which a scan was performed at 34(+0)-35(+6) weeks and delivery occurred at or beyond 37 weeks. In the 2485 pregnancies included in the analysis, the umbilical artery PI MoM was significantly higher, and the middle cerebral artery PI and cerebroplacental ratio MoM significantly lower in the babies requiring neonatal unit admission (P < .05). However, the estimated fetal weight percentile was not significantly different between those who required neonatal unit admission and those who did not (P = .087). According to multivariate logistic regression, cerebroplacental ratio MoM (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.79; P = .008) and gestational age at delivery (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.80; P < .001) were significantly associated with the risk of neonatal unit admission, whereas maternal age and birthweight percentile were not (P = .183 and P = .460, respectively). Irrespective of birthweight or estimated fetal weight percentile, the fetal cerebroplacental ratio appears to be a better predictor of the need for neonatal unit admission (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Lower cerebroplacental ratio and gestational age at delivery, but not fetal size, were independently associated with the need for admission to the neonatal unit at term in a high-risk patient group. The extent to which fetal hemodynamic assessment could be used to predict perinatal morbidity and optimize the timing of delivery merits further investigation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; birthweight; cerebroplacental ratio; neonatal unit admission; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447961     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  Doppler of the middle cerebral artery for the assessment of fetal well-being.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A Low Cerebroplacental Ratio at 20-24 Weeks of Gestation Can Predict Reduced Fetal Size Later in Pregnancy or at Birth.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Eli Maymon; Offer Erez; Homam Saker; Suchaya Luewan; Maynor Garcia; Hyunyoung Ahn; Adi L Tarca; Bogdan Done; Steven J Korzeniewski; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 3.  Systematic review evaluating the efficacy of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in saving babies lives.

Authors:  Catherine Elmes; Rita Phillips
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  MicroRNA-185-5p: a marker of brain-sparing in foetuses with late-onset growth restriction.

Authors:  José Morales-Roselló; Gabriela Loscalzo; Eva María García-Lopez; José Santiago Ibañez Cabellos; José Luis García-Gimenez; Antonio José Cañada Martínez; Alfredo Perales Marín
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  The value of introducing cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) versus umbilical artery (UA) Doppler alone for the prediction of neonatal small for gestational age (SGA) and short-term adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Karla Leavitt; Linda Odibo; Chinedu Nwabuobi; Methodius G Tuuli; Anthony Odibo
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-07-21

6.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

7.  Evaluation of the predictive value of fetal Doppler ultrasound for neonatal outcome from the 36th week of pregnancy.

Authors:  Zahra Laleh Eslamian; Elahe Zarean; Maryam Moshfeghi; Zahra Heidari
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Utility of Doppler parameters at 36-42 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses.

Authors:  Michał Migda; Katarzyna Gieryn; Bartosz Migda; Marian Stanisław Migda; Marek Maleńczyk
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2018-03-30

9.  Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Jörg Dötsch; Kurt Hecher; Dietmar Schlembach; Dagmar Schmitz; Holger Stepan; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Fetal growth restriction: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.

Authors:  Sarah Rae Easter; Linda O Eckert; Nansi Boghossian; Rebecca Spencer; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Christos Ioannou; Manasi Patwardhan; Margo S Harrison; Asma Khalil; Michael Gravett; Robert Goldenberg; Alastair McKelvey; Manish Gupta; Vitali Pool; Stephen C Robson; Jyoti Joshi; Sonali Kochhar; Tom McElrath
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.