Literature DB >> 25447437

Does the sex of a simulated patient affect CPR?

Chelsea E Kramer1, Matthew S Wilkins2, Jan M Davies3, Jeff K Caird4, Gregory M Hallihan5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While males and females are equally at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), females are less likely to be resuscitated. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) may be inhibited by socio-cultural norms about exposing female victims' chests. Empirically confirming this hypothesis is limited by lack of patient simulators modeling realistic female physiques. A commercially-available patient simulator was transformed to evaluate how physical attributes of a patient's sex might influence lay participants who were asked to resuscitate a female versus a male during simulated cardiac arrest.
METHODS: Sixty-nine participants consented to be in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to provide CPR and defibrillation as instructed by a commercially-available automated external defibrillator on a patient simulator presented as either a male or female experiencing cardiac arrest.
RESULTS: Rescuers removed significantly more clothing from the male than the female, with men removing less clothing from the female. More rescuers' initial hand placements for CPR were centered between the female's breasts compared to the male, on which placement was distributed across the chest towards the nipples. DISCUSSION: While rescuers had better hand placement for CPR on the female, both men and women rescuers were reluctant to remove the female's clothing, with men significantly more hesitant. Reticence to remove clothing was often articulated relative to social norms during structured interviews. We suggest that using only male simulators will not allow trainees to experience social differences associated with the care of a female simulated patient. Realistic female patient simulators are needed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated external defibrillators (AEDs); Bystander resuscitation; Cardiopulonary resuscitation (CPR); Experimental research; Patient simulation; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447437     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

1.  Addressing the Helper's and Victim's Gender Is Crucial in Schoolchildren Resuscitation Training-A Prospective, Educative Interventional Trial.

Authors:  Sabine Wingen; Hannes Ecker; Daniel C Schroeder; Bérénice Bartholme; Bernd W Böttiger; Wolfgang A Wetsch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Barriers to bystander CPR in deprived communities: Findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fiona Dobbie; Isa Uny; Douglas Eadie; Edward Duncan; Martine Stead; Linda Bauld; Kathryn Angus; Liz Hassled; Lisa MacInnes; Gareth Clegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Different perceptions of thorax anatomy and hand placement for chest compressions among healthcare professionals and laypersons: Implications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Ann Mai Hindkjær Østergaard; Erik L Grove; Kasper Glerup Lauridsen; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-06-29

4.  Impact of a standardised rapid response system on clinical outcomes of female patients: an interrupted time series approach.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Ken Hillman; Michael Parr; Arthas Flabouris; Malcolm Green
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-08

5.  Sex and Age Aspects in Patients Suffering From Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Analysis of 760 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Tobias Piegeler; Nils Thoeni; Alexander Kaserer; Martin Brueesch; Simon Sulser; Stefan M Mueller; Burkhardt Seifert; Donat R Spahn; Kurt Ruetzler
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.