Literature DB >> 25447373

Neural dissociation of automatic and controlled temporal preparation by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Angel Correa1, Giorgia Cona2, Sandra Arbula3, Antonino Vallesi4, Patrizia Bisiacchi5.   

Abstract

Recent neuropsychological evidence suggested a role for the right prefrontal cortex in temporal orienting of attention guided by symbolic cues, and the left prefrontal cortex in preparation guided by rhythms. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over prefrontal regions on the performances of two temporal preparation tasks, one using symbolic cues (short vs. long lines) and the other using regular rhythms (fast vs. slow pace) to indicate when (early vs. late) a target would be most likely to appear. Stimulation site was either the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right DLPFC, or sham condition. The results showed that frontal TMS produced differential effects as a function of type of cuing. In symbolic cuing, TMS on either left or right frontal sites (vs. sham) increased temporal orienting effects by reducing reaction times in valid trials. In rhythmic cuing, however, frontal TMS did not influence performance. This dissociation between two forms of temporal preparation suggests a specific role for the DLPFC in the ability of temporal orienting, but not in preparation guided by rhythms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DLPFC; Enhancement; Foreperiod; Rhythm; TMS; Temporal orienting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447373     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Unpredicted Pitch Modulates Beta Oscillatory Power during Rhythmic Entrainment to a Tone Sequence.

Authors:  Andrew Chang; Dan J Bosnyak; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-09

3.  Stimulating the Healthy Brain to Investigate Neural Correlates of Motor Preparation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Natural rhythms of periodic temporal attention.

Authors:  Arnaud Zalta; Spase Petkoski; Benjamin Morillon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Endogenous temporal attention in the absence of stimulus-driven cues emerges in the second year of life.

Authors:  Anna Martinez-Alvarez; Ferran Pons; Ruth de Diego-Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Minimal interplay between explicit knowledge, dynamics of learning and temporal expectations in different, complex uni- and multisensory contexts.

Authors:  Felix Ball; Inga Spuerck; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Effect of Tempo on Temporal Expectation Driven by Rhythms in Dual-Task Performance.

Authors:  Zhihan Xu; Yanna Ren; Yosuke Misaki; Qiong Wu; Sa Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.