Literature DB >> 25447329

Evaluation of physical and emotional responses to vibrotactile stimulation of the forearm in young adults, the elderly, and transradial amputees.

Chang-Yong Ko1, Yunhee Chang2, Sol-Bi Kim2, Shinki Kim2, Gyoosuk Kim2, Jeicheong Ryu2, Museong Mun, Musung Mun2, Tae Soo Bae.   

Abstract

Vibrotactile stimulation (VS) is widely used in the biomedical and biomechanics fields. Most studies have attempted to verify the effects and/or function of VS, but few studies have evaluated emotional response (ER) to VS, although emotions play a critical role in human behavior. This study aimed to evaluate the subjective response (SR) to VS in young, elderly, and amputee adults and to verify whether VS on the forearm evokes displeasure. Twenty-four young adults (YM: male 13, YF: female 11), 31 elderly subjects (EM: male 15, EF: female 16), and 19 transradial amputees (AM: male 11, AF: female 8) participated. Eight equally spaced vibration motors were attached around the circumference of the forearm (channels 1-4 on the lateral site and channels 5-8 on the medial site) and were located 25% of the proximal forearm. Vibration stimuli with frequencies ranging from 37Hz to 258Hz were applied. An SR 10-level test and ER (displeasure or not) test were performed. In all 3 groups, SRs to the lateral site were higher than those to the medial site (YM group, p<0.001; YF group, p=0.002; EM group, p<0.001; EF group, p=0.031; AM group, p<0.001; AF group, p=0.021). Additionally, SRs were saturated at certain frequencies (YM group, 149Hz; YF and EM groups, 198Hz; EF and AM groups, 120Hz; AF group, 176Hz). Several subjects (YM group, 7; YF group, 4; EM group, 2; EF group, 6; AM group, 3; AF group, 1) expressed displeasure, and ERs were different according to sex, age, or amputation. As a result, the lateral site was more sensitive to VS than the medial site, regardless of sex, age, or amputation. Furthermore, VS may evoke displeasure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputee adults; Elderly adults; Rehabilitation; Vibrotactile displeasure; Vibrotactile sensitivity; Vibrotactile stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447329     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  3 in total

1.  Development of a shear force measurement dummy for seat comfort.

Authors:  Seong Guk Kim; Chang-Yong Ko; Dong Hyun Kim; Ye Eun Song; Tae Uk Kang; Sungwoo Ahn; Dohyung Lim; Han Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Usman Ghafoor; Sohee Kim; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Non-invasive, Brain-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Locomotion Rehabilitation in Individuals with Paraplegia.

Authors:  Aurelie Selfslagh; Solaiman Shokur; Debora S F Campos; Ana R C Donati; Sabrina Almeida; Seidi Y Yamauti; Daniel B Coelho; Mohamed Bouri; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.