Literature DB >> 25447301

The effects of energy balance, obesity-proneness and sex on the neuronal response to sweet taste.

Marc-Andre Cornier1, Megan E Shott2, Elizabeth A Thomas3, Jamie L Bechtell3, Daniel H Bessesen3, Jason R Tregellas4, Guido K Frank5.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that propensity for weight gain, energy balance state and sex are important determinants of the neuronal response to visual food cues. It is not clear, though, whether these factors also impact the neuronal response to taste. The objective of this study was to examine the neuronal response to sweet taste during energy imbalance in men and women recruited to be obesity-prone (OP) or obesity-resistant (OR). OP (13 men and 12 women) and OR (12 men and 12 women) subjects were studied after 1 day of eucaloric, overfed and underfed conditions in a randomized crossover design. On each test day, fMRI was performed in the respective acute fed state while subjects received in random order 60 trials each of 1M sucrose solution (SU), or artificial saliva (AS) following a visual cue predicting the taste. The neuronal response to SU versus AS expectation was significantly greater in the amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen and insula in OR versus OP; SU receipt was not different between groups. There were also sex-based differences with men having greater neuronal response to SU versus AS receipt in the caudate than women. The results, however, were not impacted by the state of energy balance. In summary, response to expectation but not receipt of basic sweet taste was different in OR compared to OP, highlighting the importance of learning and conditioning in the propensity to gain weight. Response to sucrose taste receipt was stronger in men than women, raising questions about the effect of sex hormones on brain response to food.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuroimaging; Overfeeding; Sex; Sucrose; Underfeeding; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447301      PMCID: PMC4382429          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  46 in total

1.  Gonadal hormones determine sensitivity to central leptin and insulin.

Authors:  Deborah J Clegg; Lynda M Brown; Stephen C Woods; Stephen C Benoit
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.461

2.  The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Craig M Bennett; George L Wolford; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Paul J Kenny
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Processing of food pictures: influence of hunger, gender and calorie content.

Authors:  Sabine Frank; Naima Laharnar; Stephanie Kullmann; Ralf Veit; Carlos Canova; Yiwen Li Hegner; Andreas Fritsche; Hubert Preissl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effect of satiety on brain activation during chocolate tasting in men and women.

Authors:  Paul A M Smeets; Cees de Graaf; Annette Stafleu; Matthias J P van Osch; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Jeroen van der Grond
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Weight gain is associated with reduced striatal response to palatable food.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum; Kenneth Blum; Cara Bohon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The effects of overfeeding on spontaneous physical activity in obesity prone and obesity resistant humans.

Authors:  Stacy L Schmidt; Kristin A Harmon; Teresa A Sharp; Elizabeth H Kealey; Daniel H Bessesen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Gender differences in the reasons given for meal termination.

Authors:  K D Zylan
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Spoor; Cara Bohon; Marga G Veldhuizen; Dana M Small
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2008-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Reorganization of brain connectivity in obesity.

Authors:  Paul Geha; Guillermo Cecchi; R Todd Constable; Chadi Abdallah; Dana M Small
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Taste assessment in normal weight and overweight individuals with co-occurring Binge Eating Disorder.

Authors:  Jean M Arlt; Gregory S Smutzer; Eunice Y Chen
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Brain imaging demonstrates a reduced neural impact of eating in obesity.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Jeffrey M Zigman; Binu P Thomas; Perry Mihalakos; Ryan Gallagher; Michael Lutter; Thomas Carmody; Hanzhang Lu; Carol A Tamminga
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  Sex/gender differences in neural correlates of food stimuli: a systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Ariana M Chao; James Loughead; Zayna M Bakizada; Christina M Hopkins; Allan Geliebter; Ruben C Gur; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Greater Reward-Related Neuronal Response to Hedonic Foods in Women Compared with Men.

Authors:  Kristina T Legget; Marc-Andre Cornier; Daniel H Bessesen; Brianne Mohl; Elizabeth A Thomas; Jason R Tregellas
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 6.  Neuroimaging of Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity: A Review of Structure, Function, and Neurotransmission.

Authors:  Danielle S Kroll; Dana E Feldman; Catherine L Biesecker; Katherine L McPherson; Peter Manza; Paule Valery Joseph; Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  High body mass index, brain metabolism and connectivity: an unfavorable effect in elderly females.

Authors:  Arianna Sala; Maura Malpetti; Anna Ferrulli; Luigi Gianolli; Livio Luzi; Daniela Perani
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Emotional susceptibility trait modulates insula responses and functional connectivity in flavor processing.

Authors:  Sjoerd J H Ebisch; Annalisa Bello; Grazia F Spitoni; Mauro G Perrucci; Vittorio Gallese; Giorgia Committeri; Concetta Pastorelli; Luigi Pizzamiglio
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.