Literature DB >> 25447259

Implications of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines for adults in contemporary cardiovascular practice: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry.

Thomas M Maddox1, William B Borden2, Fengming Tang3, Salim S Virani4, William J Oetgen5, J Brendan Mullen6, Paul S Chan3, Paul N Casale7, Pamela S Douglas8, Fredrick A Masoudi9, Steven A Farmer2, John S Rumsfeld9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a significant update, the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guidelines recommend fixed-dose statin therapy for those at risk and do not recommend nonstatin therapies or treatment to target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, limiting the need for repeated LDL-C testing.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines on current U.S. cardiovascular practice.
METHODS: Using the NCDR PINNACLE (National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence) registry data from 2008 to 2012, we assessed current practice patterns as a function of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines. Lipid-lowering therapies and LDL-C testing patterns by patient risk group (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD], diabetes, LDL-C ≥190 mg/dl, or an estimated 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%) were described.
RESULTS: Among a cohort of 1,174,545 patients, 1,129,205 (96.1%) were statin-eligible (91.2% ASCVD, 6.6% diabetes, 0.3% off-treatment LDL-C ≥190 mg/dl, 1.9% estimated 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%). There were 377,311 patients (32.4%) not receiving statin therapy and 259,143 (22.6%) receiving nonstatin therapies. During the study period, 20.8% of patients had 2 or more LDL-C assessments, and 7.0% had more than 4.
CONCLUSIONS: In U.S. cardiovascular practices, 32.4% of statin-eligible patients, as defined by the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines, were not currently receiving statins. In addition, 22.6% were receiving nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies and 20.8% had repeated LDL-C testing. Achieving concordance with the new cholesterol guidelines in patients treated in U.S. cardiovascular practices would result in significant increases in statin use, as well as significant reductions in nonstatin therapies and laboratory testing.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular diseases; cholesterol; cohort studies; hydroxymethylglutaryl-coA reductase inhibitors; primary prevention; secondary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447259     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  42 in total

1.  The prevalence and management of angina among patients with chronic coronary artery disease across US outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study.

Authors:  Faraz Kureshi; Ali Shafiq; Suzanne V Arnold; Kensey Gosch; Tracie Breeding; Ashwath S Kumar; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Statin Use and Its Facility-Level Variation in Patients With Diabetes: Insight From the Veterans Affairs National Database.

Authors:  Yashashwi Pokharel; Julia M Akeroyd; David J Ramsey; Ravi S Hira; Vijay Nambi; Tina Shah; LeChauncy D Woodard; David E Winchester; Christie M Ballantyne; Laura A Petersen; Salim S Virani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  LDL cholesterol, statins and PCSK 9 inhibitors.

Authors:  Sanjiv Gupta
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-08-05

4.  Implications of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines on contemporary clinical practice for patients with atherosclerotic coronary and peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Prasad Gunasekaran; Vinodh Jeevanantham; Suresh Sharma; Rashmi Thapa; Kamal Gupta
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-05-22

5.  Suboptimal use of statins for secondary cardiovascular prevention: a "planetary" issue.

Authors:  Alfonso Bellia; David Della-Morte; Davide Lauro
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Practitioner Gender and Quality of Care in Ambulatory Cardiology Practices: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry.

Authors:  Dipti Gupta; Fengming Tang; Frederick A Masoudi; Philip G Jones; Paul S Chan; Stacie L Daugherty
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Trends in prescribing rate of statins at discharge and modifiable factors in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Bao-Tao Huang; Yong Peng; Fang-Yang Huang; Tian-Li Xia; Yi-Yue Gui; Yan-Biao Liao; Xiao-Bo Pu; Shi-Jian Chen; Yong Yang; Mao Chen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Risk and Benefits of Statins in Glucose Control Management of Type II Diabetes.

Authors:  Anthony Paulo Sunjaya; Angela Felicia Sunjaya; Samuel Halim; Frans Ferdinal
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-02-18

9.  Trends in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol blood values between 2012 and 2017 suggest sluggish adoption of the recent 2013 treatment guidelines.

Authors:  H Robert Superko; Paul T Williams; Michael Dansinger; Ernst Schaefer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Case-based educational intervention to assess change in providers' knowledge and attitudes towards the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guideline.

Authors:  Yashashwi Pokharel; Lynne Steinberg; Winston Chan; Julia M Akeroyd; Peter H Jones; Vijay Nambi; Khurram Nasir; Laura Petersen; Christie M Ballantyne; Salim S Virani
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.