Literature DB >> 25446661

Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.

Amos Grünebaum1, Laurence B McCullough2, Robert L Brent3, Birgit Arabin4, Malcolm I Levene5, Frank A Chervenak6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the perinatal risks of midwife-attended planned home births in the United States from 2010 through 2012 and compared them with recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for planned home births. STUDY
DESIGN: Data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics birth certificate data files from 2010 through 2012 were utilized to analyze the frequency of certain perinatal risk factors that were associated with planned midwife-attended home births in the United States and compare them with deliveries performed in the hospital by certified nurse midwives. Home birth deliveries attended by others were excluded; only planned home births attended by midwives were included. Hospital deliveries attended by certified nurse midwives served as the reference. Perinatal risk factors were those established by ACOG and AAP.
RESULTS: Midwife-attended planned home births in the United States had the following risk factors: breech presentation, 0.74% (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.87-3.56); prior cesarean delivery, 4.4% (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 2.0-2.17); twins, 0.64% (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.84-2.31); and gestational age 41 weeks or longer, 28.19% (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.68-1.74). All 4 perinatal risk factors were significantly higher among midwife-attended planned home births when compared with certified nurse midwives-attended hospital births, and 3 of 4 perinatal risk factors were significantly higher in planned home births attended by non-American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives (other midwives) when compared with home births attended by certified nurse midwives. Among midwife-attended planned home births, 65.7% of midwives did not meet the ACOG and AAP recommendations for certification by the American Midwifery Certification Board.
CONCLUSION: At least 30% of midwife-attended planned home births are not low risk and not within clinical criteria set by ACOG and AAP, and 65.7% of planned home births in the United States are attended by non-AMCB certified midwives, even though both AAP and ACOG state that only AMCB-certified midwives should attend home births.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  home birth; midwives; perinatal risks

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25446661     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Out-of-hospital births in California 1991-2011.

Authors:  A I Girsen; J A Mayo; D J Lyell; Y J Blumenfeld; D K Stevenson; Y Y El-Sayed; G M Shaw; M L Druzin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden; Janice Snyder; Brian Quigley; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Out-of-hospital deliveries: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lima Diana; Lima Glaucia; Cersosimo Adriana; Figueiredo Israel
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Planned home deliveries in Finland, 1996-2013.

Authors:  Katja Ovaskainen; Riitta Ojala; Kati Tihtonen; Mika Gissler; Tiina Luukkaala; Outi Tammela
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Planned Home Birth in Low-Risk Pregnancies in Spain: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Trinidad M Galera-Barbero; Gabriel Aguilera-Manrique
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Prevalence of Home Births and Associated Risk Profile and Maternal Characteristics, 2016-2018.

Authors:  Sonal Goyal; Katherine Kortsmit; Shanna Cox; Denise V D'Angelo; Lisa Romero; Zsakeba T Henderson; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 8.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08

9.  Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Robert L Brent; Malcolm I Levene; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.

Authors:  Stuart James Fischbein; Rixa Freeze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.