BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a major concern for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients because it is a leading cause of falls and is associated with poor quality of life. The pathophysiology is unknown but it is hypothesized that it relates to cognitive abnormalities; particularly executive and visuospatial dysfunction. However, prior results have been discrepant. Pharmacologic subtypes of FOG include those that are responsive and unresponsive to levodopa. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether executive and visuospatial dysfunction are associated specifically with the levodopa unresponsive subtype of FOG. METHODS: 135 PD subjects completed a single assessment included FOG questionnaire, UPDRS motor scale, comprehensive cognitive battery and measure of hallucinations. Analyses compared unresponsive (n = 16), responsive (n = 20) and no FOG (n = 99) subtypes. RESULTS: The unresponsive subtype had a significantly older age of onset of PD than the responsive group (p = .03) and had worse motor scores (p = .003) than the no FOG group. Longer disease duration was associated with the responsive group compared to the no FOG group (p = .002). The unresponsive FOG group had significantly poorer visuospatial ability (p = .001) and executive functioning (p = .02) than both the no and responsive FOG subgroups. These latter groups were not significantly different. The responsive FOG group was associated with the presence of hallucinations. CONCLUSION: Aside from pharmacological differences, unresponsive FOG is associated with executive and visuospatial dysfunction implicating frontostriatal pathways while responsive FOG is associated with hallucinations suggesting involvement of posterior cortical regions. Further study and treatment of FOG should include appropriate subtype classification.
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a major concern for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients because it is a leading cause of falls and is associated with poor quality of life. The pathophysiology is unknown but it is hypothesized that it relates to cognitive abnormalities; particularly executive and visuospatial dysfunction. However, prior results have been discrepant. Pharmacologic subtypes of FOG include those that are responsive and unresponsive to levodopa. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether executive and visuospatial dysfunction are associated specifically with the levodopa unresponsive subtype of FOG. METHODS: 135 PD subjects completed a single assessment included FOG questionnaire, UPDRS motor scale, comprehensive cognitive battery and measure of hallucinations. Analyses compared unresponsive (n = 16), responsive (n = 20) and no FOG (n = 99) subtypes. RESULTS: The unresponsive subtype had a significantly older age of onset of PD than the responsive group (p = .03) and had worse motor scores (p = .003) than the no FOG group. Longer disease duration was associated with the responsive group compared to the no FOG group (p = .002). The unresponsive FOG group had significantly poorer visuospatial ability (p = .001) and executive functioning (p = .02) than both the no and responsive FOG subgroups. These latter groups were not significantly different. The responsive FOG group was associated with the presence of hallucinations. CONCLUSION: Aside from pharmacological differences, unresponsive FOG is associated with executive and visuospatial dysfunction implicating frontostriatal pathways while responsive FOG is associated with hallucinations suggesting involvement of posterior cortical regions. Further study and treatment of FOG should include appropriate subtype classification.
Authors: Lena H Ting; Hillel J Chiel; Randy D Trumbower; Jessica L Allen; J Lucas McKay; Madeleine E Hackney; Trisha M Kesar Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Daniel Weiss; Anna Schoellmann; Michael D Fox; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Stewart A Factor; Alice Nieuwboer; Mark Hallett; Simon J G Lewis Journal: Brain Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Daniel S Peterson; Katrijn Smulders; Martina Mancini; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak; Brett W Fling Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.892