Literature DB >> 25446242

Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens.

Tim Hacker1, Guido Heydecke2, Daniel R Reissmann3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-perceived process-related quality of care in patients undergoing different prosthodontic treatments, and to investigate whether perceived burdens are related to specific procedures during prosthodontic treatments, i.e., to specific treatment components.
METHODS: In this non-randomised prospective intervention study, 104 dental patients (mean age: 52.2±13.9 years, 50% female) were included. Burdens during treatments with fixed dental prostheses (FDP, n=90), removable dental prostheses (RDP, n=10), and complete dentures (CD; n=4) were assessed with the Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q). The BiPD-Q total score was calculated as mean of all 25 items, and subscale scores were derived from items corresponding to six specific treatment components (anesthesia, preparation, impression, provisional care/try-in, fixation, global perception), with values ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Subscale scores were compared by using repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and effect sizes, to identify treatment components with highest burdens.
RESULTS: Mean BiPD-Q total score was 22.1, ranging from 8.6 for patients with CD to 24.0 for FDP patients. Perceived burdens differed significantly between treatment components, with highest burdens for anesthesia (score: 34.0), followed by preparation (score: 26.8) and impression (score: 24.7). When subscale score for anesthesia was compared to scores for other treatment components, effect sizes were medium to large.
CONCLUSION: While prosthodontic treatment is overall perceived as only moderately burdening, specific treatment components differ significantly in perceived burdens. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Anesthesia, preparation, and impression are treatment components with most unpleasant perceptions, offering the highest potential for improvements for patient-perceived process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burdens; Patient perception; Prosthodontics; Quality of care; Treatment steps

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25446242     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models.

Authors:  Olja Glisic; Louise Hoejbjerre; Liselotte Sonnesen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A systematic review of quality measures used in primary care dentistry.

Authors:  Matthew J Byrne; Martin Tickle; Anne-Marie Glenny; Stephen Campbell; Tom Goodwin; Lucy O'Malley
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 3.  3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Michael Edelmayer; Klara Janjić; Anna Sonja Müller; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.