Literature DB >> 25445921

The clinician in the driver's seat: part 2 - intelligent uses of space in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.

Yalini Senathirajah1, David Kaufman2, Suzanne Bakken3.   

Abstract

User-composable approaches provide clinicians with the control to design and assemble information elements on screen via drag/drop. They hold considerable promise for enhancing the electronic-health-records (EHRs) user experience. We previously described this novel approach to EHR design and our illustrative system, MedWISE. The purpose of this paper is to describe clinician users' intelligent uses of space during completion of real patient case studies in a laboratory setting using MedWISE. Thirteen clinicians at a quaternary academic medical center used the system to review four real patient cases. We analyzed clinician utterances, behaviors, screen layouts (i.e., interface designs), and their perceptions associated with completing patient case studies. Clinicians effectively used the system to review all cases. Two coding schemata pertaining to human-computer interaction and diagnostic reasoning were used to analyze the data. Users adopted three main interaction strategies: rapidly gathering items on screen and reviewing ('opportunistic selection' approach); creating highly structured screens ('structured' approach); and interacting with small groups of items in sequence as their case review progressed ('dynamic stage' approach). They also used spatial arrangement in ways predicted by theory and research on workplace spatial arrangement. This includes assignment of screen regions for particular purposes (24% of spatial codes), juxtaposition to facilitate calculation or other cognitive tasks ('epistemic action'), and grouping elements with common meanings or relevance to the diagnostic facets of the case (20.3%). A left-to-right progression of orienting materials, data, and action items or reflection space was a commonly observed pattern. Widget selection was based on user assessment of what information was useful or relevant. We developed and tested an illustrative system that gives clinicians greater control of the EHR, and demonstrated its feasibility for case review by typical clinicians. Producing the simplifying inventions, such as user-composable platforms that shift control to the user, may serve to promote productive EHR use and enhance its value as an instrument of patient care.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health record; Electronic medical record; Human–computer interaction; MedWISE; User-composable EHR; User-configurable EHR

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445921      PMCID: PMC5926811          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  15 in total

1.  WebCIS: large scale deployment of a Web-based clinical information system.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; J J Cimino; S Sengupta
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  The cognitive complexity of a provider order entry interface.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; David R Kaufman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  A framework for analyzing the cognitive complexity of computer-assisted clinical ordering.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; David R Kaufman; Michael I Oppenheim; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible.

Authors:  Yan Xiao
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 5.  Distributed cognition: an alternative model of cognition for medical informatics.

Authors:  Brian Hazlehurst; Paul N Gorman; Carmit K McMullen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Rema Padman; Michael P Johnson; Herbert S Diamond
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Essential questions: accuracy, errors and user perceptions in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.

Authors:  Yalini Senathirajah; David Kaufman; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

8.  Cognitive evaluation of decision making processes and assessment of information technology in medicine.

Authors:  A W Kushniruk; V L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Important ingredients for health adaptive information systems.

Authors:  Yalini Senathirajah; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

10.  Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Andre W Kushniruk; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.317

View more
  6 in total

1.  Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs.

Authors:  Thomas H Payne; Sarah Corley; Theresa A Cullen; Tejal K Gandhi; Linda Harrington; Gilad J Kuperman; John E Mattison; David P McCallie; Clement J McDonald; Paul C Tang; William M Tierney; Charlotte Weaver; Charlene R Weir; Michael H Zaroukian
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  We're Lost, But We are Making Good Time: Navigating Complex Pathways in a Patient-Order Management Task.

Authors:  Benjamin J Duncan; Alexandra N Kassis; David R Kaufman; Adela Grando; Karl A Poterack; Rick A Helmers; Timothy K Miksch; Lu Zheng; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype of a Learning Electronic Medical Record System.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Gregory F Cooper; Harry Hochheiser; Gilles Clermont; Shyam Visweswaran
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 4.  Methods for Addressing Technology-induced Errors: The Current State.

Authors:  E Borycki; J W Dexheimer; C Hullin Lucay Cossio; Y Gong; S Jensen; J Kaipio; S Kennebeck; E Kirkendall; A W Kushniruk; C Kuziemsky; R Marcilly; R Röhrig; K Saranto; Y Senathirajah; J Weber; H Takeda
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

5.  The clinician in the Driver's Seat: part 1 - a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record platform.

Authors:  Yalini Senathirajah; Suzanne Bakken; David Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  User-composable Electronic Health Record Improves Efficiency of Clinician Data Viewing for Patient Case Appraisal: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Yalini Senathirajah; David Kaufman; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-05-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.