Literature DB >> 25445668

Differential repositioning of the second transmembrane helices from E. coli Tar and EnvZ upon moving the flanking aromatic residues.

Salomé C Botelho1, Karl Enquist1, Gunnar von Heijne1, Roger R Draheim2.   

Abstract

Aromatic tuning, i.e. repositioning aromatic residues found at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane (TM) domains within bacterial receptors, has been previously shown to modulate signal output from the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) and the major osmosensor EnvZ of Escherichia coli. In the case of Tar, changes in signal output consistent with the vertical position of the native Trp-Tyr aromatic tandem within TM2 were observed. In contrast, within EnvZ, where a Trp-Leu-Phe aromatic triplet was repositioned, the surface that the triplet resided upon was the major determinant governing signal output. However, these studies failed to determine whether moving the aromatic residues was sufficient to physically reposition the TM helix within a membrane. Recent coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations predicted displacement of Tar TM2 upon moving the aromatic residues at the cytoplasmic end of the helix. Here, we demonstrate that repositioning the Trp-Tyr tandem within Tar TM2 displaces the C-terminal boundary of the helix relative to the membrane. In a similar analysis of EnvZ, an abrupt initial displacement of TM2 was observed but no subsequent movement was seen, suggesting that the vertical position of TM2 is not governed by the location of the Trp-Leu-Phe triplet. Our results also provide another set of experimental data, i.e. the resistance of EnvZ TM2 to being displaced upon aromatic tuning, which could be useful for subsequent refinement of the initial CG-MD simulations. Finally, we discuss the limitations of these methodologies, how moving flanking aromatic residues might impact steady-state signal output and the potential to employ aromatic tuning in other bacterial membrane-spanning receptors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aromatic tuning; Glycosylation mapping; Hydrophobic-polar membrane interface; Interfacial anchoring; Transmembrane helices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445668      PMCID: PMC4281490          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  54 in total

Review 1.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Site-directed rotational resonance solid-state NMR distance measurements probe structure and mechanism in the transmembrane domain of the serine bacterial chemoreceptor.

Authors:  Binumol Isaac; Greg J Gallagher; Yael S Balazs; Lynmarie K Thompson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  The effects of hydrophobic mismatch between phosphatidylcholine bilayers and transmembrane alpha-helical peptides depend on the nature of interfacially exposed aromatic and charged residues.

Authors:  Maurits R R de Planque; Jan-Willem P Boots; Dirk T S Rijkers; Rob M J Liskamp; Denise V Greathouse; J Antoinette Killian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Mechanism of regulation of receptor histidine kinases.

Authors:  Hedda U Ferris; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Nora Hornig; Michael Hulko; Jörg Martin; Joachim E Schultz; Kornelius Zeth; Andrei N Lupas; Murray Coles
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  The residue composition of the aromatic anchor of the second transmembrane helix determines the signaling properties of the aspartate/maltose chemoreceptor Tar of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Christopher A Adase; Roger R Draheim; Michael D Manson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Transmembrane signaling of chemotaxis receptor tar: insights from molecular dynamics simulation studies.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Wonpil Im; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Structural characterization of AS1-membrane interactions from a subset of HAMP domains.

Authors:  Sofia Unnerståle; Lena Mäler; Roger R Draheim
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-07-06

8.  Mutational analysis of the control cable that mediates transmembrane signaling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor.

Authors:  Smiljka Kitanovic; Peter Ames; John S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Determination of the border between the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of human integrin subunits.

Authors:  A Armulik; I Nilsson; G von Heijne; S Johansson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Transmembrane helix dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptors supports a piston model of signalling.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hall; Judith P Armitage; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.779

View more
  2 in total

1.  Employing aromatic tuning to modulate output from two-component signaling circuits.

Authors:  Rahmi Yusuf; Roger R Draheim
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Structural and Functional Analysis of the Escherichia coli Acid-Sensing Histidine Kinase EvgS.

Authors:  Hrishiraj Sen; Nikhil Aggarwal; Chibueze Ishionwu; Nosheen Hussain; Chandni Parmar; Mohammed Jamshad; Vassiliy N Bavro; Peter A Lund
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.490

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.