Literature DB >> 25445418

Effects of second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

In Hae Park1, Keun Seok Lee1, Jungsil Ro2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of chemotherapy regimens beyond first-line agents on the clinical outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 240 patients who were prospectively enrolled into various clinical trials and were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for HER2-negative MBC at the National Cancer Center, Korea, from October 2002 to September 2012. Clinicopathologic data were collected for the analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 240, 209, and 166 patients received first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. The median age was 49 years (range, 28-77 years), and most had hormone receptor-positive cancer (n = 177; 73.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months for first-line (PFS1) versus 5.1 months for second-line (PFS2) versus 3.6 months for third-line (PFS3) chemotherapy. The PFS from previous chemotherapy significantly affected subsequent PFS: PFS1 for PFS2, PFS1 ≥ 7.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.647; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0.484-0.864 (P = .003); PFS2 for PFS3, PFS2 ≥ 5.1 months, HR 0.676; 95% CI, 0.0.484-0.944; P = .022). The median overall survival was 31.2 months (95% CI, 26.4-36.0 months). Hormone receptor positivity (HR 0.548; 95% CI, 0.261-0.499; P < .001) and PFS1 ≥ 7.6 months (HR 0.361; 95% CI, 0.393-0.765; P < .001) were significant factors for survival on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of previous treatment significantly affected the outcomes of subsequent treatment. We have confirmed that the succession of chemotherapy is justified in patients with MBC who benefited from previous chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Drug resistance; Metastatic breast cancer; Progression free survival; Response rate

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445418     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Objective Response to First-Line Treatment as a Predictor of Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Centers over a 25-Year Period.

Authors:  Alexios Matikas; Athanasios Kotsakis; Maria Perraki; Dora Hatzidaki; Konstantinos Kalbakis; Emmanouil Kontopodis; Michail Nikolaou; Vasilios Georgoulias
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 2.  An Overview of PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Cortesi; Hope S Rugo; Christian Jackisch
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).

Authors:  Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Simon Peter Gampenrieder; Andreas Petzer; Sonja Burgstaller; David Fuchs; Dieter Rossmann; Marija Balic; Daniel Egle; Holger Rumpold; Christian F Singer; Rupert Bartsch; Edgar Petru; Thomas Melchardt; Hanno Ulmer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Richard Greil
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Outcome beyond third-line chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the French ESME program.

Authors:  Luc Cabel; Matthieu Carton; Barbara Pistilli; Florence Dalenc; Laurence Vanlemnens; Christelle Levy; William Jacot; Michel Debled; Agnes Loeb; Audrey Hennequin; Thibault De la Motte Rouge; Lilian Laborde; Carine Laurent; E Chamorey; Damien Parent; Thierry Petit; Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier; Mario Campone; Geneviève Perrocheau; Claire Labreveux; Thomas Bachelot; Mathieu Robain; Florence Lerebours
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Impact of the line of treatment on progression-free survival in patients treated with T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Migeotte; V Dufour; A van Maanen; M Berliere; J L Canon; D Taylor; F P Duhoux
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Effect of Relaxation With Guided Imagery on The Physical and Psychological Symptoms of Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shu-Fen Chen; Hsiu-Ho Wang; Hsing-Yu Yang; Ue-Lin Chung
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Javier Cortes; Stacie Hudgens; Chris Twelves; Edith A Perez; Ahmad Awada; Louise Yelle; Susan McCutcheon; Peter A Kaufman; Anna Forsythe; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Is progression-free survival a more relevant endpoint than overall survival in first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer?

Authors:  Anna Forsythe; David Chandiwana; Janina Barth; Marroon Thabane; Johan Baeck; Anastasiya Shor; Gabriel Tremblay
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Prior acquired resistance to paclitaxel relays diverse EGFR-targeted therapy persistence mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark Borris D Aldonza; Jayoung Ku; Ji-Young Hong; Donghwa Kim; Seung Jung Yu; Min-Seok Lee; Monica Celine Prayogo; Stephanie Tan; Dayeon Kim; Jinju Han; Sang Kook Lee; Sung Gap Im; Han Suk Ryu; Yoosik Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Combination Strategies to Improve Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.

Authors:  Tiffany G Chan; Edward O'Neill; Christine Habjan; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 10.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.