Literature DB >> 25444820

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in HIV-negative men who have sex with men to prevent recurrent high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Ashish A Deshmukh1, Elizabeth Y Chiao2, Prajnan Das3, Scott B Cantor4.   

Abstract

We examined the long-term clinical and economic benefits of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine as a secondary/adjunct prevention strategy in the prevention of recurrent high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) in HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) and are 27 years or older. We constructed a Markov model to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two strategies: (1) no qHPV vaccine after treatment for HGAIN versus (2) qHPV vaccine after treatment for HGAIN. Model parameters, including natural history of anal cancer, vaccine efficacy measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) (decrease in the risk of recurrent HGAIN), HGAIN treatment efficacy, utilities, and costs, were obtained from the literature. The outcomes were measured in terms of lifetime risk of anal cancer, lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analysis was conducted on all model parameters. We found that vaccinating HIV-negative MSM reduced the lifetime risk of anal cancer by 60.77% at an ICER of US$87,240 per quality-adjusted life-year. The results were highly sensitive to vaccine efficacy, transition of HGAIN to anal cancer, cost of treatment for HGAIN, vaccine degree of protection over time, and the vaccine duration of protection and less sensitive to HPV clearance, cost of qHPV vaccine, and the transitions from normal to low-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (LGAIN) and normal to HGAIN. With an HR of 0.3, the ICER was well below a $50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold; with an HR of 0.5, the ICER was still below a threshold of $100,000. The most critical disease-related factor influencing the cost-effectiveness was the progression of HGAIN to anal cancer. At an annual transition probability below 0.001, the ICER was below $50,000. Vaccinating HIV-negative MSM treated for HGAIN decreases the lifetime risk of anal cancer and is likely to be a cost-effective intervention. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal neoplasia; Cost-effectiveness analysis; High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; Human papillomavirus; Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine; Secondary/adjunct prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444820      PMCID: PMC4254641          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  29 in total

Review 1.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  L B Russell; M R Gold; J E Siegel; N Daniels; M C Weinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Mathematical model for the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  E R Myers; D C McCrory; K Nanda; L Bastian; D B Matchar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Infrared coagulator: a useful tool for treating anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Stephen E Goldstone; Adam Z Kawalek; Jeff W Huyett
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-negative homosexual and bisexual men.

Authors:  S J Goldie; K M Kuntz; M C Weinstein; K A Freedberg; J M Palefsky
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Molecular biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a comparison of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.

Authors:  Pascal Gervaz; Dieter Hahnloser; Bruce G Wolff; Sarah A Anderson; Julie Cunningham; Robert W Beart; Adam Klipfel; Lawrence Burgart; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Increased incidence of cancer among homosexual men, New York City and San Francisco, 1978-1990.

Authors:  B A Koblin; N A Hessol; A G Zauber; P E Taylor; S P Buchbinder; M H Katz; C E Stevens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Virologic, immunologic, and clinical parameters in the incidence and progression of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men.

Authors:  J M Palefsky; E A Holly; C J Hogeboom; M L Ralston; M M DaCosta; R Botts; J M Berry; N Jay; T M Darragh
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1998-04-01

Review 8.  The economic burden of noncervical human papillomavirus disease in the United States.

Authors:  Delphine Hu; Sue Goldie
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prospective study of high grade anal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of homosexual men: influence of HIV infection, immunosuppression and human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  C W Critchlow; C M Surawicz; K K Holmes; J Kuypers; J R Daling; S E Hawes; G M Goldbaum; J Sayer; C Hurt; C Dunphy
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  High sustained efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine through 5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  L L Villa; R L R Costa; C A Petta; R P Andrade; J Paavonen; O-E Iversen; S-E Olsson; J Høye; M Steinwall; G Riis-Johannessen; A Andersson-Ellstrom; K Elfgren; G von Krogh; M Lehtinen; C Malm; G M Tamms; K Giacoletti; L Lupinacci; R Railkar; F J Taddeo; J Bryan; M T Esser; H L Sings; A J Saah; E Barr
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Basic Science, Epidemiology, and Screening for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Its Relationship to Anal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Kurt G Davis; Guy R Orangio
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 2.  Present challenges in cervical cancer prevention: Answers from cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Mireia Diaz; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch; Laia Bruni
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Management of precancerous anal intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Scott B Cantor; Elizabeth A Stier; Stephen E Goldstone; Alan G Nyitray; Timothy Wilkin; Xiaojie Wang; Jagpreet Chhatwal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccinations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Neil Murthy; Harrell W Chesson; Matthew Biggerstaff; Charles Stoecker; Aaron M Harris; Anna Acosta; Kathleen Dooling; Carolyn B Bridges
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Extending the Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme to Include Males in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness Studies.

Authors:  Mohamed-Béchir Ben Hadj Yahia; Anaïs Jouin-Bortolotti; Benoît Dervaux
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Adjuvant HPV vaccination for anal cancer prevention in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: The time is now.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Scott B Cantor; Elisabeth Fenwick; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Alan G Nyitray; Elizabeth A Stier; Stephen E Goldstone; Timothy Wilkin; Jagpreet Chhatwal
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  HPV vaccine acceptability in HIV-infected and HIV negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ireland.

Authors:  C Sadlier; A Lynam; S O'Dea; S Delamere; M Quinlan; S Clarke; O Sheils; C Bergin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Should human papillomavirus vaccination target women over age 26, heterosexual men and men who have sex with men? A targeted literature review of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Nyi Nyi Soe; Jason J Ong; Xiaomeng Ma; Christopher K Fairley; Phyu Mon Latt; Jun Jing; Feng Cheng; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Cost Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Men Who have Sex with Men; Reviewing the Available Evidence.

Authors:  Didik Setiawan; Abrham Wondimu; KohJun Ong; Albert Jan van Hoek; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Long-Term Outcomes of Adding HPV Vaccine to the Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment Regimen in HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Alan G Nyitray; Prajnan Das; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.