Literature DB >> 25444773

Citizen science: a new direction in canine behavior research.

Julie Hecht1, Eleanor Spicer Rice2.   

Abstract

Researchers increasingly rely on members of the public to contribute to scientific projects-from collecting or identifying, to analyzing and disseminating data. The "citizen science" model proves useful to many thematically distinctive fields, like ornithology, astronomy, and phenology. The recent formalization of citizen science projects addresses technical issues related to volunteer participation--like data quality--so that citizen scientists can make longstanding, meaningful contributions to scientific projects. Since the late 1990s, canine science research has relied with greater frequency on the participation of the general public, particularly dog owners. These researchers do not typically consider the methods and technical issues that those conducting citizen science projects embrace and continue to investigate. As more canine science studies rely on public input, an in-depth knowledge of the benefits and challenges of citizen science can help produce relevant, high-quality data while increasing the general public's understanding of canine behavior and cognition as well as the scientific process. We examine the benefits and challenges of current citizen science models in an effort to enhance canine citizen science project preparation, execution, and dissemination. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Canine Behavior.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Data quality; Dog; Public participation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444773     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  Citizen Science as a New Tool in Dog Cognition Research.

Authors:  Laughlin Stewart; Evan L MacLean; David Ivy; Vanessa Woods; Eliot Cohen; Kerri Rodriguez; Matthew McIntyre; Sayan Mukherjee; Josep Call; Juliane Kaminski; Ádám Miklósi; Richard W Wrangham; Brian Hare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Working the crowd for forensic research: A review of contributor motivation and recruitment strategies used in crowdsourcing and crowdfunding for scientific research.

Authors:  Rebecca Parrick; Brendan Chapman
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Genetic Pathways of Aging and Their Relevance in the Dog as a Natural Model of Human Aging.

Authors:  Sára Sándor; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Man's best friend in life and death: scientific perspectives and challenges of dog brain banking.

Authors:  Sára Sándor; Kálmán Czeibert; Attila Salamon; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 7.713

5.  Cross-species referential signalling events in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Hannah K Worsley; Sean J O'Hara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Building Bridges between Theory and Practice: How Citizen Science Can Bring Equine Researchers and Practitioners Together.

Authors:  Kate Fenner; Katherine Dashper; Cristina Wilkins; James Serpell; Andrew McLean; Bethany Wilson; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Using a new video rating tool to crowd-source analysis of behavioural reaction to stimuli.

Authors:  Holly Root-Gutteridge; Louise P Brown; Jemma Forman; Anna T Korzeniowska; Julia Simner; David Reby
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.