Literature DB >> 25444560

Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars: synthesis and future opportunities.

Régis Fichot1, Franck Brignolas1, Hervé Cochard2,3, Reinhart Ceulemans4.   

Abstract

Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation is a key trait of plant water relations. Here, we summarize the available literature on vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars (Populus spp.), a genus of agronomic, ecological and scientific importance. Vulnerability curves and vulnerability parameters (including the water potential inducing 50% loss in hydraulic conductivity, P50) were collected from 37 studies published between 1991 and 2014, covering a range of 10 species and 12 interspecific hybrid crosses. Results of our meta-analysis confirm that poplars are among the most vulnerable woody species to drought-induced cavitation (mean P50  = -1.44 and -1.55 MPa across pure species and hybrids, respectively). Yet, significant variation occurs among species (P50 range: 1.43 MPa) and among hybrid crosses (P50 range: 1.12 MPa), within species and hybrid crosses (max. P50 range reported: 0.8 MPa) as well as in response to environmental factors including nitrogen fertilization, irradiance, temperature and drought (max. P50 range reported: 0.75 MPa). Potential implications and gaps in knowledge are discussed in the context of poplar cultivation, species adaptation and climate modifications. We suggest that poplars represent a valuable model for studies on drought-induced cavitation, especially to elucidate the genetic and molecular basis of cavitation resistance in Angiosperms.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Populus; genetic variation; interspecific hybrids; phenotypic plasticity; pure species; trade-offs; water deficit; xylem anatomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25444560     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  8 in total

1.  Does acclimation in cavitation resistance due to mechanical perturbation support the pit area or conduit reinforcement hypotheses in Phaseolus vulgaris?

Authors:  Steven L Matzner; Natalie Ronning; Jonathan Hawkinson; Tara Cummiskey; Jackson Buchanan; Emma Miller; Grady Carlisle
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.500

2.  Developmental, genetic and environmental variations of global DNA methylation in the first leaves emerging from the shoot apical meristem in poplar trees.

Authors:  Le Gac A-L; Lafon-Placette C; Delaunay A; Maury S
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-03-27

3.  Investigations concerning cavitation and frost fatigue in clonal 84K poplar using high-resolution cavitron measurements.

Authors:  Feng Feng; Fei Ding; Melvin T Tyree
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Limited plasticity of anatomical and hydraulic traits in aspen trees under elevated CO2 and seasonal drought.

Authors:  Fran Lauriks; Roberto Luis Salomón; Linus De Roo; Willem Goossens; Olivier Leroux; Kathy Steppe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Splitting the Difference: Heterogeneous Soil Moisture Availability Affects Aboveground and Belowground Reserve and Mass Allocation in Trembling Aspen.

Authors:  Ashley T Hart; Morgane Merlin; Erin Wiley; Simon M Landhäusser
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Growth and physiological responses of isohydric and anisohydric poplars to drought.

Authors:  Ziv Attia; Jean-Christophe Domec; Ram Oren; Danielle A Way; Menachem Moshelion
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Strategies of tree species to adapt to drought from leaf stomatal regulation and stem embolism resistance to root properties.

Authors:  Zhicheng Chen; Shan Li; Xianchong Wan; Shirong Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Intraspecific Variation in Wood Anatomical, Hydraulic, and Foliar Traits in Ten European Beech Provenances Differing in Growth Yield.

Authors:  Peter Hajek; Daniel Kurjak; Georg von Wühlisch; Sylvain Delzon; Bernhard Schuldt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.