Jessica A Nadeau1, Robert A Bednarczyk2, Munyaradzi R Masawi3, Megan D Meldrum3, Loretta Santilli3, Shelley M Zansky3, Debra S Blog3, Guthrie S Birkhead4, Louise-Anne McNutt5. 1. School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY. 2. School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3. New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY. 4. School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY; New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY. 5. Institute for Health and the Environment, State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY. Electronic address: LAMCNUTT@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify children vaccinated following an alternative vaccine schedule using immunization information system data and determine the impact of alternative schedule use on vaccine coverage. STUDY DESIGN: Children born in New York State, outside New York City, between January 1, 2009 and August 14, 2011 were assessed for vaccination patterns consistent with use of an alternative schedule. Children who by 9 months of age had at least 3 vaccination visits recorded in the statewide mandatory immunization information system after 41 days of age were classified as either attempting to conform to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published recommended vaccination schedule or an alternative schedule. The number of vaccination visits and up-to-date status at age 9 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 222 628 children studied, the proportion of children following an alternative schedule was 25%. These children were significantly less likely to be up-to-date at age 9 months (15%) compared with those conforming to the routine schedule (90%, P < .05). Children following an alternative schedule on average had about 2 extra vaccine visits compared with children following a routine schedule (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 1 in 4 children in this study appear to be intentionally deviating from the routine schedule. Intentional deviation leads to poor vaccination coverage leaving children vulnerable to infection and increasing the potential for vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks.
OBJECTIVE: To identify children vaccinated following an alternative vaccine schedule using immunization information system data and determine the impact of alternative schedule use on vaccine coverage. STUDY DESIGN:Children born in New York State, outside New York City, between January 1, 2009 and August 14, 2011 were assessed for vaccination patterns consistent with use of an alternative schedule. Children who by 9 months of age had at least 3 vaccination visits recorded in the statewide mandatory immunization information system after 41 days of age were classified as either attempting to conform to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published recommended vaccination schedule or an alternative schedule. The number of vaccination visits and up-to-date status at age 9 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 222 628 children studied, the proportion of children following an alternative schedule was 25%. These children were significantly less likely to be up-to-date at age 9 months (15%) compared with those conforming to the routine schedule (90%, P < .05). Children following an alternative schedule on average had about 2 extra vaccine visits compared with children following a routine schedule (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 1 in 4 children in this study appear to be intentionally deviating from the routine schedule. Intentional deviation leads to poor vaccination coverage leaving children vulnerable to infection and increasing the potential for vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks.
Authors: Paula M Frew; Raphiel Murden; C Christina Mehta; Allison T Chamberlain; Alan R Hinman; Glen Nowak; Judith Mendel; Ann Aikin; Laura A Randall; Allison L Hargreaves; Saad B Omer; Walter A Orenstein; Robert A Bednarczyk Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Paula M Frew; Allison Kennedy Fisher; Michelle M Basket; Yunmi Chung; Jay Schamel; Judith L Weiner; Jennifer Mullen; Saad B Omer; Walter A Orenstein Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Kimberly H Nguyen; Anup Srivastav; Megan C Lindley; Allison Fisher; David Kim; Stacie M Greby; James Lee; James A Singleton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sophia R Newcomer; Rain E Freeman; Bekki K Wehner; Stacey L Anderson; Matthew F Daley Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Matthew F Daley; Liza M Reifler; Jo Ann Shoup; Komal J Narwaney; Elyse O Kharbanda; Holly C Groom; Michael L Jackson; Steven J Jacobsen; Huong Q McLean; Nicola P Klein; Joshua T B Williams; Eric S Weintraub; Michael M McNeil; Jason M Glanz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 5.043