Literature DB >> 25444457

Children do not recalibrate motor-sensory temporal order after exposure to delayed sensory feedback.

Tiziana Vercillo1, David Burr2,3, Giulio Sandini1, Monica Gori1.   

Abstract

Prolonged adaptation to delayed sensory feedback to a simple motor act (such as pressing a key) causes recalibration of sensory-motor synchronization, so instantaneous feedback appears to precede the motor act that caused it (Stetson, Cui, Montague & Eagleman, 2006). We investigated whether similar recalibration occurs in school-age children. Although plasticity may be expected to be even greater in children than in adults, we found no evidence of recalibration in children aged 8-11 years. Subjects adapted to delayed feedback for 100 trials, intermittently pressing a key that caused a tone to sound after a 200 ms delay. During the test phase, subjects responded to a visual cue by pressing a key, which triggered a tone to be played at variable intervals before or after the keypress. Subjects judged whether the tone preceded or followed the keypress, yielding psychometric functions estimating the delay when they perceived the tone to be synchronous with the action. The psychometric functions also gave an estimate of the precision of the temporal order judgment. In agreement with previous studies, adaptation caused a shift in perceived synchrony in adults, so the keypress appeared to trail behind the auditory feedback, implying sensory-motor recalibration. However, school children of 8 to 11 years showed no measureable adaptation of perceived simultaneity, even after adaptation with 500 ms lags. Importantly, precision in the simultaneity task also improved with age, and this developmental trend correlated strongly with the magnitude of recalibration. This suggests that lack of recalibration of sensory-motor simultaneity after adaptation in school-age children is related to their poor precision in temporal order judgments. To test this idea we measured recalibration in adult subjects with auditory noise added to the stimuli (which hampered temporal precision). Under these conditions, recalibration was greatly reduced, with the magnitude of recalibration strongly correlating with temporal precision.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444457      PMCID: PMC4487828          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  37 in total

1.  Spectral pattern discrimination by children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-02

2.  Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence.

Authors:  Tonja-Katrin Machulla; Massimiliano Di Luca; Eva Froehlich; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frequency resolution in children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman; D Kistler; T Dolan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

4.  Development of perceptual correlates of reading performance.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Susan E Hall; Raymond M Klein; Dennis P Phillips
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Exposure to delayed visual feedback of the hand changes motor-sensory synchrony perception.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Non-retinotopic motor-visual recalibration to temporal lag.

Authors:  Masaki Tsujita; Makoto Ichikawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-19

8.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A neural model for temporal order judgments and their active recalibration: a common mechanism for space and time?

Authors:  Mingbo Cai; Chess Stetson; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

10.  Speech and non-speech audio-visual illusions: a developmental study.

Authors:  Corinne Tremblay; François Champoux; Patrice Voss; Benoit A Bacon; Franco Lepore; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spatial modulation of motor-sensory recalibration in early deaf individuals.

Authors:  Tiziana Vercillo; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The capacity to learn new motor and perceptual calibrations develops concurrently in childhood.

Authors:  Cristina Rossi; Connie W Chau; Kristan A Leech; Matthew A Statton; Anthony J Gonzalez; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Role of Awareness on Motor-Sensory Temporal Recalibration.

Authors:  Mikaela Bubna; Melanie Y Lam; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.154

5.  Predictive coding of multisensory timing.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-17

6.  Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age-Related Changes in Sensorimotor Temporal Binding.

Authors:  Tiziana Vercillo; Carlos Carrasco; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Sensory experience during early sensitive periods shapes cross-modal temporal biases.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Pia Ley; Siddhart S Rajendran; Idris Shareef; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.