M C de Hoyos-Alonso1, J Bonis2, E Tapias-Merino3, M V Castell4, A Otero5. 1. Centro de Salud Pedro Laín Entralgo, DA Oeste, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Alcorcón, Madrid, España. Electronic address: mcanto.hoyos@salud.madrid.org. 2. Proyecto BIFAP, División de Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Agencia Española del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid, España. 3. Centro de Salud Comillas, DA Centro, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España. 4. Centro de Salud Dr. Castroviejo, DA Norte, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España; IdiPAZ, Instituto de Investigación La Paz, Madrid, España. 5. IdiPAZ, Instituto de Investigación La Paz, Madrid, España; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The progressive rise in dementia prevalence increases the need for rapid methods that complement population-based prevalence studies. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dementia in the population aged 65 and older based on use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. METHODS: Descriptive study of use and prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors and/or memantine in 2011 according to 2 databases: Farm@drid (pharmacy billing records for the Region of Madrid) and BIFAP (database for pharmacoepidemiology research in primary care, with diagnosis and prescription records). We tested the comparability of drug use results from each database using the chi-square test and prevalence ratios. The prevalence of dementia in Madrid was estimated based on the dose per 100 inhabitants/day, adjusting the result for data obtained from BIFAP on combination treatment in the general population (0.37%) and the percentage of dementia patients undergoing treatment (41.13%). RESULTS: Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine were taken by 2.08% and 0.72% of Madrid residents aged 65 and older was respectively. Both databases displayed similar results for use of these drugs. The estimated prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 and older is 5.91% (95% CI%, 5.85-5.95) (52 287 people), and it is higher in women (7.16%) than in men (4.00%). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated prevalence of dementia is similar to that found in population-based studies. Analysing consumption of specific dementia drugs can be a reliable and inexpensive means of updating prevalence data periodically and helping rationalise healthcare resources.
INTRODUCTION: The progressive rise in dementia prevalence increases the need for rapid methods that complement population-based prevalence studies. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dementia in the population aged 65 and older based on use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. METHODS: Descriptive study of use and prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors and/or memantine in 2011 according to 2 databases: Farm@drid (pharmacy billing records for the Region of Madrid) and BIFAP (database for pharmacoepidemiology research in primary care, with diagnosis and prescription records). We tested the comparability of drug use results from each database using the chi-square test and prevalence ratios. The prevalence of dementia in Madrid was estimated based on the dose per 100 inhabitants/day, adjusting the result for data obtained from BIFAP on combination treatment in the general population (0.37%) and the percentage of dementiapatients undergoing treatment (41.13%). RESULTS:Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine were taken by 2.08% and 0.72% of Madrid residents aged 65 and older was respectively. Both databases displayed similar results for use of these drugs. The estimated prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 and older is 5.91% (95% CI%, 5.85-5.95) (52 287 people), and it is higher in women (7.16%) than in men (4.00%). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated prevalence of dementia is similar to that found in population-based studies. Analysing consumption of specific dementia drugs can be a reliable and inexpensive means of updating prevalence data periodically and helping rationalise healthcare resources.
Authors: Carmen M Sarabia-Cobo; Paula Parás-Bravo; Francisco José Amo-Setién; Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero; María Sáenz-Jalón; Blanca Torres-Manrique; Raquel Sarabia-Lavín; Angela Fernández-Rodríguez; Tamara Silio-García; Rosario Fernández-Peña; María Paz-Zulueta; Miguel Santibáñez-Margüello Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura Parra-Anguita; Francisco P García-Fernández; Rafael Del-Pino-Casado; Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Victoria García-Martín; M Canto de Hoyos-Alonso; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Rosalía Delgado-Puebla; Paula García-Domingo; Erika Hernández-Melo; Javier López de Haro-de Torres; Isabel Del Cura-González Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.921