Literature DB >> 25444300

[GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].

Angela Kaminski-Hartenthaler1, Joerg J Meerpohl2, Gerald Gartlehner3, Christina Kien3, Gero Langer4, Jörg Wipplinger3, Holger J Schünemann5.   

Abstract

This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to classifying the direction and strength of recommendations. The strength of a recommendation, separated into strong and weak, is defined as the extent to which one can be confident that the desirable effects of an intervention outweigh its undesirable effects. Alternative terms for a weak recommendation include conditional, discretionary, or qualified. The strength of a recommendation has specific implications for patients, the public, clinicians, and policy makers. Occasionally, guideline developers may choose to make "only-in-research" recommendations. Although panels may choose not to make recommendations, this choice leaves those looking for answers from guidelines without the guidance they are seeking. GRADE therefore encourages panels to, wherever possible, offer recommendations.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Einstufung von Evidenz; Empfehlungen; GRADE; Leitlinienentwicklung; Qualität der Evidenz; Stärke der Evidenz; grading; guideline development; quality of evidence; recommendations; strength of evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444300     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  6 in total

1.  [Evidence-based recommendations for the revision of the Austrian periodic health examination].

Authors:  Isolde Sommer; Viktoria Titscher; Birgit Teufer; Irma Klerings; Barbara Nußbaumer-Streit; Monika Szelag; Lisa Affengruber; Gernot Wagner; Anna Glechner; Christina Kien; Agnes Ebenberger; Irmgard Schiller-Frühwirth; Thomas E Dorner; Andrea Siebenhofer; Bernd Haditsch; Herbert Bachler; Uwe Siebert; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to the guideline development for clinical practice with acupuncture and moxibustion.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Fengxia Liang; Yigong Fang; Baoyan Liu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygena tion in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency.

Authors:  Falk Fichtner; Onnen Moerer; Sven Laudi; Steffen Weber-Carstens; Monika Nothacker; Udo Kaisers
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

Authors:  Robert Siegel; Ricardo Niklas Werner; Stephan Koswig; Matthew Gaskins; Claus Rödel; Felix Aigner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 8.251

5.  Cinacalcet versus Placebo for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Guoqi Wang; Hongyan Liu; Chengzhi Wang; Xiaojian Ji; Weijun Gu; Yiming Mu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Use of Chest Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19: A WHO Rapid Advice Guide.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Ivana Blazic; Sally Yaacoub; Guy Frija; Roger Chou; John Adabie Appiah; Mansoor Fatehi; Nicola Flor; Eveline Hitti; Hussain Jafri; Zheng-Yu Jin; Hans Ulrich Kauczor; Michael Kawooya; Ella Annabelle Kazerooni; Jane P Ko; Rami Mahfouz; Valdair Muglia; Rose Nyabanda; Marcelo Sanchez; Priya B Shete; Marina Ulla; Chuansheng Zheng; Emilie van Deventer; Maria Del Rosario Perez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.