Literature DB >> 25444298

The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand.

Yot Teerawattananon1, Nattha Tritasavit2, Netnapis Suchonwanich3, Pritaporn Kingkaew1.   

Abstract

Medicines expenditure consumes a significant proportion of public health expenditure in Thailand, where Universal Health Coverage has been in place since 2002. The National List of Essential Medicines has been successfully used as a pharmaceutical benefits package for all public health plans. All patients are eligible for all medicines included in the list free of charge by law. Health economic evaluation has been employed as a tool for the development of this list, including price negotiation of medicines before inclusion, especially of high-cost medicines or medicines with high budget implications. This paper illustrates the current process, mechanisms, and impact and informs of seven success factors that have contributed to the successful use of health economic evaluation in Thailand. These include strong political commitment, development of individual and institutional capacity, participation of all relevant stakeholders, establishment of standard methodological and process guidelines, consideration of several elements in the decision-making process, using evidence as a starting point rather than a deciding factor, and strong enforcement. The lessons learned from this study are likely to be applicable to other settings committed to evidence-based decision making.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entscheidungsfindung; Erstattung; Health economic evaluation; Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung; Thailand; decision-making; reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444298     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  27 in total

1.  Incorporating cost-effectiveness data in a fair process for priority setting efforts Comment on "Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden".

Authors:  Sitaporn Youngkong
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-04-11

2.  Weight Reduction and Pioglitazone are Cost-Effective for the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Thailand.

Authors:  Bunchai Chongmelaxme; Pochamana Phisalprapa; Ratree Sawangjit; Piyameth Dilokthornsakul; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future.

Authors:  Praveen Thokala; Jessica Ochalek; Ashley A Leech; Thaison Tong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A cost-utility analysis of dabigatran, enoxaparin, and usual care for venous thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee replacement surgery in Thailand.

Authors:  Surachai Kotirum; Bunchai Chongmelaxme; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Cost-Utility Analysis Compared Between Radiotherapy Alone and Combined Surgery and Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases in Thailand.

Authors:  Pasawat Taechalertpaisarn; Sirichai Wilartratsami; Pochamana Phisalprapa; Chayanis Kositamongkol; Achiraya Teyateeti; Panya Luksanapruksa
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-12

6.  State of rare disease management in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Azuwana Supian; Jeremy Lim; Matt Zafra; Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  National Methodological Guidelines to Conduct Budget Impact Analysis for Health Technology Assessment in India.

Authors:  Shankar Prinja; Yashika Chugh; Kavitha Rajsekar; V R Muraleedharan
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Assessing the performance of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies: developing a multi-country, multi-stakeholder, and multi-dimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.

Authors:  Robyn Millar; Alec Morton; Maria Vittoria Bufali; Sven Engels; Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Kalipso Chalkidou; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-07-02

Review 9.  Using Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks.

Authors:  Virginia Wiseman; Craig Mitton; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Tom Drake; Lesong Conteh; Anthony T Newall; Obinna Onwujekwe; Stephen Jan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Development of a Health Screening Package Under the Universal Health Coverage: The Role of Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Yot Teerawattananon; Pritaporn Kingkaew; Tanunya Koopitakkajorn; Sitaporn Youngkong; Nattha Tritasavit; Patsri Srisuwan; Sripen Tantivess
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.