Katerina Kotzampassi1, Efthymios Eleftheriadis2. 1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 2. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: ele.makis@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal operation is a complication difficult to manage because conservative therapy and/or reoperation may be unsuccessful and carry the risk of increased morbidity and mortality. The endoscopic use of tissue sealants appears to be a promising alternative to avoid operation. METHOD: We present conclusively our 25-year experience with tissue sealing in a series of 63 patients referred after gastrointestinal anastomosis leakage; 48 of the upper and 15 of the lower gastrointestinal tract, experiencing a drainage volume ranging 50-2,400 mL. RESULTS: Tissue glue was applied orally in 37, anally in 10, through the fistula tract in 8, and through a combination of approximation routes in another 8 cases. Biological glue (fibrin) was used in 47, cyanoacrylate in 8, and both glue types in another 8 patients. The total volume of fibrin applied was 2-36 mL, in a median of four sessions, 0.5-4 mL for cyanoacrylate, in a median of two sessions, and, whenever a combination of glues was used, a volume of 12-40 mL of fibrin plus 1-4 mL of cyanoacrylate, in a median of nine sessions. The median hospital stay after initiation of gluing was 14 days (range 8-32). The clinical and technical success rate was 96.8% (61 of 63 patients). CONCLUSION: Tissue glue appears to be a valuable clinical tool that would prevent further operative interventions and the associated morbidity and mortality after a gastrointestinal anastomosis dehiscence. However, it must be borne in mind that repeated sessions and large volumes of sealants are necessary in many cases.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal operation is a complication difficult to manage because conservative therapy and/or reoperation may be unsuccessful and carry the risk of increased morbidity and mortality. The endoscopic use of tissue sealants appears to be a promising alternative to avoid operation. METHOD: We present conclusively our 25-year experience with tissue sealing in a series of 63 patients referred after gastrointestinal anastomosis leakage; 48 of the upper and 15 of the lower gastrointestinal tract, experiencing a drainage volume ranging 50-2,400 mL. RESULTS: Tissue glue was applied orally in 37, anally in 10, through the fistula tract in 8, and through a combination of approximation routes in another 8 cases. Biological glue (fibrin) was used in 47, cyanoacrylate in 8, and both glue types in another 8 patients. The total volume of fibrin applied was 2-36 mL, in a median of four sessions, 0.5-4 mL for cyanoacrylate, in a median of two sessions, and, whenever a combination of glues was used, a volume of 12-40 mL of fibrin plus 1-4 mL of cyanoacrylate, in a median of nine sessions. The median hospital stay after initiation of gluing was 14 days (range 8-32). The clinical and technical success rate was 96.8% (61 of 63 patients). CONCLUSION: Tissue glue appears to be a valuable clinical tool that would prevent further operative interventions and the associated morbidity and mortality after a gastrointestinal anastomosis dehiscence. However, it must be borne in mind that repeated sessions and large volumes of sealants are necessary in many cases.
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Lorenzo C Pescatori; Chiara Mattiuz; Dario Poretti; Vittorio Pedicini; Fabio Melchiorre; Umberto Rossi; Luigi Solbiati; Luca Maria Sconfienza Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 3.469