Literature DB >> 25444141

Clinical impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.

Alan D Enriquez1, Brandon Calenda2, Parul U Gandhi2, Ajith P Nair2, Anelechi C Anyanwu2, Sean P Pinney2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with the HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), but the impact of AF on clinical outcomes is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of AF on outcomes in patients with the HMII LVAD.
METHODS: Records of 106 patients who underwent HMII implantation at a single center were reviewed. The associations of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) with survival, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, bleeding, and thromboembolism were examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Mean age was 56.6 ± 11.4 years, 87.7% of the implants were intended as a bridge to transplantation, and median length of support was 217 days (range: 1 to 952 days). AF was present in 55 patients (51.9%); 36 patients (34.0%) had PAF and 19 (17.9%) had PeAF. Twenty-one patients (19.8%) died, and 18 (17.0%) were hospitalized for HF. There were 0.75 major bleeding events and 0.28 thromboembolic events per patient year of follow-up. PAF was not associated with increased mortality, HF hospitalization, bleeding, or thromboembolism. PeAF, however, was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio: 3.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 8.25; p < 0.01). Although there was no increase in bleeding or thromboembolism, patients with AF had thromboembolic events at higher international normalized ratios (INRs).
CONCLUSIONS: Although PAF is not associated with worse outcomes in patients with the HMII LVAD, PeAF may be associated with increased mortality and HF hospitalization. Patients with AF also may have thromboembolic events at higher INR levels.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; left ventricular assist device; thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444141     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  17 in total

1.  CrossTalk opposing view: Blood flow pulsatility in left ventricular assist device patients is not essential to maintain normal brain physiology.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Justin Lawley; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization after left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Abra Guo; Eric J Charles; Alan M Speir; Jeffrey B Rich; Mohammed A Quader; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  A Case of Wide Complex Tachycardia in a Patient with a Biventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  P Abrams Mark; Whang William; Iyer Vivek; Garan Hasan; Biviano Angelo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Authors:  Roderick Tung; Cevher Ozcan
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-04

Review 5.  Chronic outpatient management of patients with a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Elisa M Smith; Jennifer Franzwa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Incidence and Outcomes of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Amrish Deshmukh; Ankit Bhatia; Emeka Anyanwu; Takeyoshi Ota; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Nir Uriel; Roderick Tung; Cevher Ozcan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 7.  Prevention and Treatment of Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; Milena Jani; David Fermin; Jennifer K McDermott; Diane Vancamp; Sangjin Lee
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-12

8.  Initial experience with telemonitoring in left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Stephan Hohmann; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker; Thorben König; Dominik Berliner; Jasmin Hanke; Günes Dogan; Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Bryan Lynch; Daniel Burkhoff; Axel Haverich; Johann Bauersachs; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Left ventricular assist device exchange for the treatment of HeartMate II pump thrombosis.

Authors:  Jasmin S Hanke; Günes Dogan; Leonard Wert; Marcel Ricklefs; Jan Heimeshoff; Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Stroke Incidence and Impact of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Cerebrovascular Physiology.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Amrut V Ambardekar; Tomio Tran; Jay D Pal; Luis Cava; Justin Lawley; Takashi Tarumi; Christy L Cornwell; Keith Aaronson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.