Literature DB >> 25444119

Evaluation of leaching potential of three systemic neonicotinoid insecticides in vineyard soil.

Sudarshan Kurwadkar1, Remington Wheat2, Donald G McGahan3, Forrest Mitchell3.   

Abstract

Dinotefuran (DNT), imidacloprid (IMD), and thiamethoxam (THM) are commonly used neonicotinoid insecticides in a variety of agriculture operations. Although these insecticides help growers control pest infestation, the residual environmental occurrence of insecticides may cause unintended adverse ecological consequences to non-target species. In this study, the leaching behavior of DNT, IMD, and THM was investigated in soils collected from an active AgriLife Research Extension Center (AREC) vineyard. A series of column experiments were conducted to evaluate the leaching potential of insecticides under two experimental scenarios: a) individual pulse mode, and b) mixed pulse mode. In both scenarios, the breakthrough pattern of the insecticides in the mostly acidic to neutral vineyard soil clearly demonstrates medium to high leachability. Of the three insecticides studied for leaching, DNT has exhibited high leaching potential and exited the column with fewer pore volumes, whereas IMD was retained for longer, indicating lower leachability. Relative differences in leaching behavior of neonicotinoids could be attributed to their solubility with the leaching pattern IMD<THM<DNT showing strong correlation with increasing aqueous solubility 610mg/L<4100mg/L<39,830mg/L. Triplicate column study experiments were conducted to evaluate the consistency of the breakthrough pattern of these insecticides. The repeatability of the breakthrough curves shows that both DNT and IMD are reproducible between runs, whereas, THM shows some inconsistency. Leaching behavior of neonicotinoid insecticides based on the leachability indices such as groundwater ubiquity score, relative leaching potential, and partitioning between different environmental matrices through a fugacity-based equilibrium criterion model clearly indicates that DNT may pose a greater threat to aquatic resources compared to IMD and THM.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dinotefuran; Fugacity; Groundwater ubiquity score; Imidacloprid; Mobility; Neonicotinoids; Thiamethoxam; Vineyard

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444119     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  5 in total

1.  Imidacloprid transport and sorption nonequilibrium in single and multilayered columns of Immokalee fine sand.

Authors:  Jorge A Leiva; Peter Nkedi-Kizza; Kelly T Morgan; Davie M Kadyampakeni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Larval exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impacts adult size in the farmland butterfly Pieris brassicae.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; George Norville; Andre Gilburn; Dave Goulson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Emerging Contaminant Imidacloprid in Mediterranean Soils: The Risk of Accumulation Is Greater than the Risk of Leaching.

Authors:  Mirna Petković Didović; Tomasz Kowalkowski; Dalibor Broznić
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Widespread detections of neonicotinoid contaminants in central Wisconsin groundwater.

Authors:  Benjamin Z Bradford; Anders S Huseth; Russell L Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A spectrum of preferential flow alters solute mobility in soils.

Authors:  Jesse Radolinski; Hanh Le; Sheldon S Hilaire; Kang Xia; Durelle Scott; Ryan D Stewart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.