Literature DB >> 25443914

Penile fracture: outcomes of early surgical intervention.

Daniel E W Swanson1, A Scott Polackwich1, Brian T Helfand2, Puneet Masson3, James Hwong4, Daniel D Dugi1, Ann C Martinez Acevedo1, Jason C Hedges5, Kevin T McVary6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a series of penile fractures, describing preoperative evaluation, surgical repair, and long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records from Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Oregon Health & Science University from 2002 to 2011 were reviewed. Clinical presentation, preoperative evaluation, time from injury, mechanism and site of injury, and presence of urethral injury were assessed. Outcomes including erectile dysfunction, penile curvature, and voiding symptoms were evaluated using International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function scores.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with 30 separate episodes of penile fractures presenting to the emergency room were identified. Mean patient age was 43 ± 9.6 years. The time from presentation to the initiation of surgery was 5.5 ± 4.4 hours. Mechanism of injury was intercourse in 26 of 30 fractures with the remaining attributed to masturbation or "rolling over." Immediate surgical repair was offered to all patients. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgery. Urethral injury was noted in 5 of the 27. The site of fracture was at the proximal shaft in 11, mid shaft in 12, and distal shaft in 4 patients. The mean follow-up period was 14.3 ± 15.8 weeks. Nine patients reported new mild erectile dysfunction or penile curvature. One patient reported new irritative voiding symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The most common mechanism of penile fracture was from sexual intercourse, and frequent concomitant urethral injuries were observed. The frequency of concomitant urethral injury was higher than in previous studies. Although we observed high incidence of erectile dysfunction or penile curvature with early surgical repair, we retain it as the favored approach.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443914     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of penile fracture: A controlled study.

Authors:  Erkin Saglam; Fatih Tarhan; Mustafa B Hamarat; Utku Can; Alper Coskun; Emre Camur; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-06-02

2.  Penile refracture: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Rodrigo Barros; Matheus Guimarães; César Nascimento; Luis Rogério Araújo; Leandro Koifman; Luciano Alves Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Sexual Function Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of Penile Fracture.

Authors:  Yassine Ouanes; Mohamed Hafedh Saadi; Houssem Haj Alouene; Mokhtar Bibi; Ahmed Sellami; Sami Ben Rhouma; Yassine Nouira
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.491

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.