Literature DB >> 25443807

The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations.

Janna R Willoughby1, Nadia B Fernandez, Maureen C Lamb, Jamie A Ivy, Robert C Lacy, J Andrew DeWoody.   

Abstract

The goal of captive breeding programmes is often to maintain genetic diversity until re-introductions can occur. However, due in part to changes that occur in captive populations, approximately one-third of re-introductions fail. We evaluated genetic changes in captive populations using microsatellites and mtDNA. We analysed six populations of white-footed mice that were propagated for 20 generations using two replicates of three protocols: random mating (RAN), minimizing mean kinship (MK) and selection for docility (DOC). We found that MK resulted in the slowest loss of microsatellite genetic diversity compared to RAN and DOC. However, the loss of mtDNA haplotypes was not consistent among replicate lines. We compared our empirical data to simulated data and found no evidence of selection. Our results suggest that although the effects of drift may not be fully mitigated, MK reduces the loss of alleles due to inbreeding more effectively than random mating or docility selection. Therefore, MK should be preferred for captive breeding. Furthermore, our simulations show that incorporating microsatellite data into the MK framework reduced the magnitude of drift, which may have applications in long-term or extremely genetically depauperate captive populations.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; docility; mean kinship; microsatellite; mitochondrial DNA; pedigree

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443807     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  15 in total

1.  2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.

Authors:  Robert S Sikes
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  The genetic consequences of captive breeding, environmental change and human exploitation in the endangered peninsular pronghorn.

Authors:  Anastasia Klimova; Jesus Neftalí Gutiérrez-Rivera; Victor Sánchez-Sotomayor; Joseph Ivan Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Genetic variability and structure of jaguar (Panthera onca) in Mexican zoos.

Authors:  Pilar Rueda-Zozaya; Germán D Mendoza-Martínez; Daniel Martínez-Gómez; Octavio Monroy-Vilchis; José Antonio Godoy; Armando Sunny; Francisco Palomares; Cuauhtémoc Chávez; José Herrera-Haro
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Multiple Paternity in a Reintroduced Population of the Orinoco Crocodile (Crocodylus intermedius) at the El Frío Biological Station, Venezuela.

Authors:  Natalia A Rossi Lafferriere; Rafael Antelo; Fernando Alda; Dick Mårtensson; Frank Hailer; Santiago Castroviejo-Fisher; José Ayarzagüena; Joshua R Ginsberg; Javier Castroviejo; Ignacio Doadrio; Carles Vilá; George Amato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Getting off to a good start? Genetic evaluation of the ex situ conservation project of the Critically Endangered Montseny brook newt (Calotriton arnoldi).

Authors:  Emilio Valbuena-Ureña; Anna Soler-Membrives; Sebastian Steinfartz; Mònica Alonso; Francesc Carbonell; Raquel Larios-Martín; Elena Obon; Salvador Carranza
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Jamie A Ivy; Robert C Lacy; Jacqueline M Doyle; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Founder events, isolation, and inbreeding: Intercontinental genetic structure of the domestic ferret.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Michelle G Hawkins; Tracy L Drazenovich; Robert Church; Susan A Brown; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Roger Moraga; Liz Brown; Simone Cleland; Marc P Hoeppner; Richard F Maloney; Anne Richardson; Lyndon Slater; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 9.  Hybridization and extinction.

Authors:  Marco Todesco; Mariana A Pascual; Gregory L Owens; Katherine L Ostevik; Brook T Moyers; Sariel Hübner; Sylvia M Heredia; Min A Hahn; Celine Caseys; Dan G Bock; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Unexpected but welcome. Artificially selected traits may increase fitness in wild boar.

Authors:  Domenico Fulgione; Daniela Rippa; Maria Buglione; Martina Trapanese; Simona Petrelli; Valeria Maselli
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.