Literature DB >> 25443517

Treatment patterns and annual drug costs of biologic therapies across indications from the Humana commercial database.

Andrew Howe1, Laura Ten Eyck, Robert Dufour, Neel Shah, David J Harrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of biologic therapies are currently used for the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). These diseases require long-term treatment, and information regarding the use and costs of biologic therapies can be valuable in making treatment and formulary decisions for clinicians and payers.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current utilization and annual costs of biologic therapies for treatment of RA, PsO, PsA, and AS in a real-world setting.
METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort analysis utilized data from the Humana commercial claims database. Eligible patients had an index (first) claim between February 1, 2008, and September 30, 2011, for abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, or ustekinumab and a diagnosis of RA, PsO, PsA, AS, or combination of these diseases. Patients with and without a claim for their index therapy within 180 days prior to their index dates were defined as continuing and new patients, respectively. Outcomes included 1-year rates of persistence; rates of restarting, discontinuing, or switching for patients who were not persistent; and annual costs. Costs were based on dose and the October 2013 wholesale acquisition cost (WAC). Total expenditure was calculated as the (total index biologic drug utilization × WAC) + (number of administrations × Medicare fee schedule) + Σ(biologic dose after discontinuation × associated WAC price).
RESULTS: Of 2,721 patients analyzed, 1,308 (48%) were new patients, and 1,413 (52%) were continuing patients. Across approved indications, the most commonly used biologics were adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. Continuing patients had higher rates of persistence on index therapy than new patients. The mean annual cost [SD] per treated patient for new patients across all indications was numerically lowest for adalimumab ($20,916 [$7,572]), followed by infliximab ($22,516 [$8,460]) and etanercept ($23,567 [$8,314]). The mean annual cost [SD] per treated patient for continuing patients across all indications was numerically lowest for etanercept ($21,508 [$6,769]), followed by infliximab ($22,852 [$11,674]) and adalimumab ($24,341 [$8,906]).
CONCLUSIONS: The tumor necrosis factor blockers adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were the most commonly used biologics across indications. New patients were less persistent than those continuing on therapy. Among new patients, adalimumab had the lowest mean annual cost per treated patient, and etanercept had the lowest mean annual cost per treated patient among those continuing on therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443517     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.12.1236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  18 in total

1.  Direct healthcare costs and comorbidity burden among patients with psoriatic arthritis in the USA.

Authors:  Joseph F Merola; Vivian Herrera; Jacqueline B Palmer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  The Challenge of Managing Psoriasis: Unmet Medical Needs and Stakeholder Perspectives.

Authors:  Steven R Feldman; Bernard Goffe; Gary Rice; Matthew Mitchell; Mandeep Kaur; Debbie Robertson; Debra Sierka; Jeffrey A Bourret; Tamara S Evans; Alice Gottlieb
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-12

3.  Second-line treatment persistence and costs among patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases treated with subcutaneous TNF-alpha inhibitors.

Authors:  Johan Dalén; Axel Svedbom; Christopher M Black; Sumesh Kachroo
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Plain Radiographs Among Adolescents With Back Pain and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Sohrab S Virk; Walter P Samora; Frank M Phillips; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

5.  Treatment patterns and costs for anti-TNFα biologic therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Palmer; Yunfeng Li; Vivian Herrera; Minlei Liao; Melody Tran; Zafer E Ozturk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Claims Data Analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment Dosing Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Methods.

Authors:  Gundula Krack; Henning Zeidler; Jan Zeidler
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-09

7.  Economic impact of biologic utilization patterns in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Sergio Schwartzman; Yunfeng Li; Huanxue Zhou; Jacqueline B Palmer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Chastek; John White; Damon Van Voorhis; Derek Tang; Bradley S Stolshek
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tao Gu; Neel Shah; Gaurav Deshpande; Derek H Tang; Debra F Eisenberg
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-12

Review 10.  Switching Between Biological Treatments in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Luisa Costa; Carlo Perricone; Maria Sole Chimenti; Antonio Del Puente; Paolo Caso; Rosario Peluso; Paolo Bottiglieri; Raffaele Scarpa; Francesco Caso
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.