Ibrahim Ali Ahmad1, Anas Al-Jadaa2. 1. Restorative Dentistry Department, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: ibrahimali79@yahoo.com. 2. Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Dental Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The knowledge of root canal anatomy is essential to ensure a successful outcome of surgical and nonsurgical root canal treatment. The aims of this article were to present 2 cases of maxillary molars with 3 mesiobuccal root canals and to review the available literature on this anatomic variation. METHODS: The first case described a nonsurgical root canal treatment of tooth #16 in a 29-year-old man with the aid of a dental operating microscope. In the second case, an extracted maxillary right first molar was scanned by a micro-computed tomographic system and reconstructed 3-dimensionally using modeling software. RESULTS: In both cases, the mesiobuccal root had 3 canals (type 3-2 in case I and type 3-3 in case II), whereas the distobuccal and palatal roots had a single canal. The literature review showed that the overall incidence of 3-canaled mesiobuccal roots in maxillary molars ranged from 1.3%-2.4% and that the most common root canal configuration was type 3-2. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should always anticipate the presence of extra canals in maxillary molars and use all the available tools to locate and treat these.
INTRODUCTION: The knowledge of root canal anatomy is essential to ensure a successful outcome of surgical and nonsurgical root canal treatment. The aims of this article were to present 2 cases of maxillary molars with 3 mesiobuccal root canals and to review the available literature on this anatomic variation. METHODS: The first case described a nonsurgical root canal treatment of tooth #16 in a 29-year-old man with the aid of a dental operating microscope. In the second case, an extracted maxillary right first molar was scanned by a micro-computed tomographic system and reconstructed 3-dimensionally using modeling software. RESULTS: In both cases, the mesiobuccal root had 3 canals (type 3-2 in case I and type 3-3 in case II), whereas the distobuccal and palatal roots had a single canal. The literature review showed that the overall incidence of 3-canaled mesiobuccal roots in maxillary molars ranged from 1.3%-2.4% and that the most common root canal configuration was type 3-2. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should always anticipate the presence of extra canals in maxillary molars and use all the available tools to locate and treat these.
Authors: Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Jorge N R Martins; Hugo Plascencia; Marco A Versiani; Clovis M Bramante Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Margarete B McGuigan; Christie Theodorakou; Henry F Duncan; Jonathan Davies; Anita Sengupta; Keith Horner Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 2.419