Literature DB >> 25443245

Local and general anaesthesia do not influence outcome of transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

Gianni Dall'Ara1, Helene Eltchaninoff2, Neil Moat1, Cécile Laroche3, Javier Goicolea4, Gian Paolo Ussia5, Petr Kala6, Peter Wenaweser7, Marian Zembala8, Georg Nickenig9, Thomas Snow10, Susanna Price1, Eduardo Alegria Barrero11, Rodrigo Estevez-Loureiro12, Bernard Iung13, José Luis Zamorano14, Gerhard Schuler15, Ottavio Alfieri16, Bernard Prendergast17, Peter Ludman18, Stephan Windecker7, Manel Sabate19, Martine Gilard20, Adam Witkowski21, Haim Danenberg22, Erwin Schroeder23, Francesco Romeo5, Carlos Macaya24, Genevieve Derumeaux25, Alessio Mattesini1, Luigi Tavazzi26, Carlo Di Mario27.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is great variability for the type of anaesthesia used during TAVI, with no clear consensus coming from comparative studies or guidelines. We sought to detect regional differences in the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Europe and to evaluate the relationship between type of anaesthesia and in-hospital and 1 year outcome.
METHODS: Between January 2011 and May 2012 the Sentinel European TAVI Pilot Registry enrolled 2807 patients treated via a transfemoral approach using either local (LA-group, 1095 patients, 39%) or general anaesthesia (GA-group, 1712 patients, 61%).
RESULTS: A wide variation in LA use was evident amongst the 10 participating countries. The use of LA has increased over time (from a mean of 37.5% of procedures in the first year, to 57% in last 6 months, p<0.01). MI, major stroke as well as in-hospital death rate (7.0% LA vs 5.3% GA, p=0.053) had a similar incidence between groups, confirmed in multivariate regression analysis after adjusting for confounders. Dividing our population in tertiles according to the Log-EuroSCORE we found similar mortality under LA, whilst mortality was higher in the highest risk tertile under GA. Survival at 1 year, compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar between groups (log-rank: p=0.1505).
CONCLUSIONS: Selection of anaesthesia appears to be more influenced by national practice and operator preference than patient characteristics. In the absence of an observed difference in outcomes for either approach, there is no compelling argument to suggest that operators and centres should change their anaesthetic practice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia; Aortic valve stenosis; Outcome; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443245     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sedation versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Keita Sato; Philip M Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Awake transcatheter aortic valve replacement-an anesthesiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Jiapeng Huang; Sheng Wang; Jiakai Lu
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes, Indications, Complications, and Innovations.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Ignacio Inglessis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 4.  Is local anaesthesia a favourable approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing local and general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Constanze Ehret; Rolf Rossaint; Ann Christina Foldenauer; Christian Stoppe; Ana Stevanovic; Katharina Dohms; Marc Hein; Gereon Schälte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  N Patrick Mayr; Jonathan Michel; Sabine Bleiziffer; Peter Tassani; Klaus Martin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Mid-term survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Results with respect to the anesthetic management and to the access route (transfemoral versus transapical).

Authors:  Caroline Gauthier; Parla Astarci; Philippe Baele; Amine Matta; David Kahn; Joëlle Kefer; Mona Momeni
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  The role of TTE in assessment of the patient before and following TAVI for AS.

Authors:  John Fryearson; Nicola C Edwards; Sagar N Doshi; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-14

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a revolution in the therapy of elderly and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Teoman Kilic; Irem Yilmaz
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in general anaesthesia or conscious sedation: data from the prospective global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study.

Authors:  Kerstin Piayda; Katharina Hellhammer; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Boris Schmidt; Patrizio Mazzone; Sergio Berti; Sven Fischer; Juha Lund; Matteo Montorfano; Paolo Della Bella; Ryan Gage; Tobias Zeus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in different European centres.

Authors:  Matthias Lutz; David Messika-Zeitoun; Tanja K Rudolph; Eberhard Schulz; Jeetendra Thambyrajah; Guy Lloyd; Alexander Lauten; Norbert Frey; Jana Kurucova; Martin Thoenes; Cornelia Deutsch; Peter Bramlage; Richard Paul Steeds
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.