Literature DB >> 25443075

Revisional surgery after failed gastric banding: results of one-stage conversion to RYGB in 195 patients.

Edo Aarts1, Parweez Koehestanie2, Kemal Dogan2, Frits Berends2, Ignace Janssen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most performed restrictive bariatric procedure is the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). With many patients still receiving a LAGB in Europe and the United States, inevitably, the number of complications also increases. For many complications revisional bariatric surgery is necessary. In this study, the outcomes of one-stage LAGB conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at our institution are presented. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficiency of RYGB performed as a one-stage procedure after failed LAGB.
METHODS: Patients were retrospectively selected using a prospectively collected database. The gastric band had to be in situ for at least 1 year and minimum postoperative follow-up was 12 months. The revisional RYGB had to be performed as a 1-step procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were included while 3 were lost to follow up. Overall, 178 (91%) procedures were performed without perioperative complications, and only 8 (4%) patients required reoperation within 30 days. The mean follow-up was 40 months (±24) after RYGB. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) increased from 25% (±26/-50- 120%) to 60% (±21.2/0- 130), 65% (±23.5/0- 131), 63% (±24.2/2- 132), 60% (±24.1/0- 111) and 53% (±28.7/-39- 109) in the first 5 postoperative years.
CONCLUSION: Converting a gastric band to a RYGB in a one-stage procedure is safe and feasible, with acceptable complication rates when performed in a specialized institution. The RYGB conversion results in a good EWL of 65% after 2 years. However, proper patient selection is of the utmost importance.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric band; LAGB; Redo; Revisional surgery; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443075     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  16 in total

Review 1.  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis.

Authors:  Nunzio Velotti; Antonio Vitiello; Giovanna Berardi; Katia Di Lauro; Mario Musella
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-19

2.  Revisional But Not Conversional Gastric Bypass Surgery Increases the Risk of Leaks: Review of 176 Redo out of 932 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Marine Benois; Lionel Sebastianelli; Adeline Morisot; Imed Ben Amor; Jean Gugenheim; Laurent Bailly; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as an Effective Bariatric Revisional Surgery after Restrictive Procedures.

Authors:  Rosa Marti-Fernandez; Norberto Cassinello-Fernandez; Maria Desamparados Cuenca-Ramirez; Maria Lapeña-Rodriguez; Maria Carmen Fernandez-Moreno; Raquel Alfonso-Ballester; Joaquin Ortega-Serrano
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Safety and efficacy of single-stage conversion of failed adjustable gastric band to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kamran Samakar; Travis J McKenzie; James Kaberna; Ali Tavakkoli; Ashley H Vernon; Arin L Madenci; Scott A Shikora; Malcolm K Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conversion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Gastric Bypass: a Comparison to Primary Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Abbas Al-Kurd; Ronit Grinbaum; Ala'a Abubeih; Baha Siam; Muhammad Ghanem; Haggi Mazeh; Ido Mizrahi; Nahum Beglaibter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Safety of one-stage conversion surgery after failed gastric band: our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Peter W Lundberg; Abigail Gotsch; Eonjung Kim; Leonardo Claros; Jill Stotlzfus; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Concomitant Removal of Gastric Band and Gastric Bypass: Analysis of Outcomes and Complications from the ACS-NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Elie P Ramly; Bassem Y Safadi; Hanaa Dakour Aridi; Rami Kantar; Aurelie Mailhac; Ramzi S Alami
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Vitamin and Mineral Deficiencies After Biliopancreatic Diversion and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch--the Rule Rather than the Exception.

Authors:  Jens Homan; Bark Betzel; Edo O Aarts; K Dogan; Kees J H M van Laarhoven; Ignace M C Janssen; Frits J Berends
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Luigi Angrisani; Antonio Vitiello; Antonella Santonicola; Ariola Hasani; Maurizio De Luca; Paola Iovino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Single-stage revision from gastric band to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy: 6- and 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Yeung; Brandice Durkan; Allison Barrett; Cary Kraft; Kim Vu; Edward Phillips; Scott Cunneen; Miguel Burch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.