Literature DB >> 25443026

Ring or suture annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation? A meta-analysis review.

Alessandro Parolari1, Fabio Barili2, Alberto Pilozzi1, Davide Pacini3.   

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis of early and long-term outcomes after tricuspid repair to compare the results of suture-based and prosthetic ring annuloplasty with the employment of an algorithm that derives the original patient time-to-event data. There was an advantage in early but not in long-term survival with the use of the annuloplasty ring. The freedom from moderate tricuspid regurgitation was significantly better in patients with ring annuloplasty (78.9% ± 5.0% at 15 years vs 60.0% ± 4.2%, log-rank p = 0.0107). The ring annuloplasty is associated to better outcomes, being a protective factor for early mortality and long-term recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation after surgery.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443026     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  16 in total

Review 1.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Steven Phan; David H Tian; Tristan D Yan; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

2.  Comparison of outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3D-rigid versus flexible prosthetic ring for functional tricuspid regurgitation secondary to rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Haiping Wang; Xiancheng Liu; Xin Wang; Zhenqian Lv; Xiaojun Liu; Ping Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Long-term echocardiographic follow-up of untreated 2+ functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kunio Kusajima; Tomoyuki Fujita; Hiroki Hata; Yusuke Shimahara; Sayaka Miura; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

4.  Tricuspid leaflet repair: innovative solutions.

Authors:  Jack H Boyd; J James B Edelman; David H Scoville; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

5.  A Growth-Accommodating Implant for Paediatric Applications.

Authors:  Eric N Feins; Yuhan Lee; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Shogo Shimada; Ingeborg Friehs; Douglas Perrin; Peter E Hammer; Haruo Yamauchi; Gerald Marx; Andrew Gosline; Veaceslav Arabagi; Jeffrey M Karp; Pedro J Del Nido
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation: two different patterns of right heart reverse remodelling.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Luca Dell'Angela; Marco Morosin; Luca Maschietto; Bruno Pinamonti; Bernardo Benussi; Gabriella Forti; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Gianfranco Sinagra; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

7.  De Vega Tricuspid Annuloplasty for Pediatric Patients: Growth Potential of the Plicated Annulus.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamamoto; Koji Nomura; Fumiaki Murayama; Sho Isobe; Kenji Hoshino
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 8.  Tricuspid valve disease: diagnosis, prognosis and management of a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  Lluis Asmarats; Maurizio Taramasso; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  [Plastic repair of tricuspid valve: Carpentier's ring annuloplasty versus De VEGA technique].

Authors:  Salma Charfeddine; Rania Hammami; Faten Triki; Leila Abid; Mourad Hentati; Imed Frikha; Samir Kammoun
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 10.  Secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation: a forgotten entity.

Authors:  Pilar Tornos Mas; José F Rodríguez-Palomares; Manuel J Antunes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.