Literature DB >> 25442797

Building for tomorrow today: opportunities and directions in radiology resident research.

John-Paul J Yu1, Akash P Kansagra2, Ashesh Thaker3, Andrew Colucci4, Steven J Sherry5, Rathan M Subramaniam6.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: With rapid scientific and technological advancements in radiological research, there is renewed emphasis on promoting early research training to develop researchers who are capable of tackling the hypothesis-driven research that is typically funded in contemporary academic research enterprises. This review article aims to introduce radiology residents to the abundant radiology research opportunities available to them and to encourage early research engagement among trainees.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To encourage early resident participation in radiology research, we review the various research opportunities available to trainees spanning basic, clinical, and translational science opportunities to ongoing research in information technology, informatics, and quality improvement research.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an incredible breadth and depth of ongoing research at academic radiology departments across the country, and the material presented herein aspires to highlight both subject matter and opportunities available to radiology residents eager to engage in radiologic research. The opportunities for interested radiology residents are as numerous as they are broad, spanning the basic sciences to clinical research to informatics, with abundant opportunities to shape our future practice of radiology.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiology resident research; radiologic research; radiology research opportunities

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442797      PMCID: PMC4427032          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  40 in total

1.  Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Informatics in radiology: Measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Quality initiatives: Quality improvement in radiology: basic principles and tools required to achieve success.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal; Ronald Eisenberg; Jacob Sosna; Chun Sham Yam; Joshua D Kruskal; Phillip M Boiselle
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Enabling comparative effectiveness research with informatics: show me the data!

Authors:  Nabile M Safdar; Eliot Siegel; Bradley J Erickson; Paul Nagy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations.

Authors:  Tao Ai; John N Morelli; Xuemei Hu; Dapeng Hao; Frank L Goerner; Bryan Ager; Val M Runge
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  How to set up a departmental comparative effectiveness research unit: one department's experience.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; John D Port; Claire E Bender
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Demise of film.

Authors:  David E Avrin; Thomas H Urbania
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Patient-centered outcomes research in radiology: trends in funding and methodology.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong; David A Schoenfeld; Eric T Chou; Pamela K Woodard; John T Nagurney; J Hector Pope; Thomas H Hauser; Charles S White; Scott G Weiner; Shant Kalanjian; Michael E Mullins; Issam Mikati; W Frank Peacock; Pearl Zakroysky; Douglas Hayden; Alexander Goehler; Hang Lee; G Scott Gazelle; Stephen D Wiviott; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Teaching Critical Thinking in Graduate Medical Education: Lessons Learned in Diagnostic Radiology.

Authors:  Benjamin Morrissey; Marta E Heilbrun
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2017-03-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.