Literature DB >> 25442513

Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study.

J C Hopkins1, N Howes, K Chalmers, J Savovic, K Whale, K D Coulman, R Welbourn, R N Whistance, R C Andrews, J P Byrne, D Mahon, J M Blazeby.   

Abstract

Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery needs a core outcome set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a particular condition. The aim of this study was to summarize outcome reporting in bariatric surgery to inform the development of a COS. Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large non-randomized studies identified by a systematic review were listed verbatim and categorized into domains, scrutinizing the frequency of outcome reporting and uniformity of definitions. Ninety studies (39 RCTs) identified 1,088 separate outcomes, grouped into nine domains with most (n = 920, 85%) reported only once. The largest outcome domain was 'surgical complications', and overall, 42% of outcomes corresponded to a theme of 'adverse events'. Only a quarter of outcomes were defined, and where provided definitions, which were often contradictory. Percentage of excess weight loss was the main study outcome in 49 studies, but nearly 40% of weight loss outcomes were heterogeneous, thus not comparable. Outcomes of diverse bariatric operations focus largely on adverse events. Reporting is inconsistent and ill-defined, limiting interpretation and comparison of published studies. Thus, we propose and are developing a COS for the surgical treatment of severe and complex obesity.
© 2014 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; complications; core outcome set; outcome reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442513     DOI: 10.1111/obr.12240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  26 in total

Review 1.  Behavioural Interventions for Severe Obesity Before and/or After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona Stewart; Alison Avenell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Outcome Measures in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Letter to the Editor regarding Mocanu et al. Ongoing Inconsistencies in Weight Loss Reporting Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review. Obesity Surgery https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03702-6Mocanu.

Authors:  Nick Finer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Heather Bagley; Karen L Barnes; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T Brookes; Mike Clarke; Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah Gorst; Nicola Harman; Jamie J Kirkham; Angus McNair; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Jochen Schmitt; Caroline B Terwee; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  The use of adjustable gastric bands for management of severe and complex obesity.

Authors:  James C A Hopkins; Jane M Blazeby; Chris A Rogers; Richard Welbourn
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  A systematic review of the outcomes reported in trials of medication review in older patients: the need for a core outcome set.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Beuscart; Lisa G Pont; Stefanie Thevelin; Benoit Boland; Olivia Dalleur; Anne W S Rutjes; Johanna I Westbrook; Anne Spinewine
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Practices Concerning Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Survey of 460 Surgeons.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Abdelrahman Nimeri; Marco Adamo; Cynthia-Michelle Borg; Rishi Singhal; Omar Khan; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Long-Term Outcomes of Obesity Surgery and Implications for Health System Planning.

Authors:  James Charles Hopkins; Richard Welbourn
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-09

9.  Ongoing Inconsistencies in Weight Loss Reporting Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentin Mocanu; Awrad Nasralla; Jerry Dang; Mack Jacobson; Noah Switzer; Karen Madsen; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Systematic Review of Innovation Reporting in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew C Currie; Michael A Glaysher; Natalie S Blencowe; Jamie Kelly
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.