Literature DB >> 25442371

Do employment protection policies reduce the relative disadvantage in the labour market experienced by unhealthy people? A natural experiment created by the Great Recession in Europe.

Aaron Reeves1, Marina Karanikolos2, Johan Mackenbach3, Martin McKee2, David Stuckler4.   

Abstract

Unhealthy persons are more likely to lose their jobs than those who are healthy but whether this is affected by recession is unclear. We asked how healthy and unhealthy persons fared in labour markets during Europe's 2008-2010 recessions and whether national differences in employment protection helped mitigate any relative disadvantage experienced by those in poor health. Two retrospective cohorts of persons employed at baseline were constructed from the European Statistics of Income and Living Conditions in 26 EU countries. The first comprised individuals followed between 2006 and 2008, n = 46,085 (pre-recession) and the second between 2008 and 2010, n = 85,786 (during recession). We used multi-level (individual- and country-fixed effects) logistic regression models to assess the relationship (overall and disaggregated by gender) between recessions, unemployment, and health status, as well as any modifying effect of OECD employment protection indices measuring the strength of policies against dismissal and redundancy. Those with chronic illnesses and health limitations were disproportionately affected by the recession, respectively with a 1.5- and 2.5-fold greater risk of unemployment than healthy people during 2008-2010. During severe recessions (>7% fall in GDP), employment protections did not mitigate the risk of job loss (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.21). However, in countries experiencing milder recessions (<7% fall in GDP), each additional unit of employment protection reduced job loss risk (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.90). Before the recession, women with severe health limitations especially benefited, with additional reductions of 22% for each unit of employment protection (AORfemale = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.97), such that at high levels the difference in the risk of job loss between healthy and unhealthy women disappeared. Employment protection policies may counteract labour market inequalities between healthy and unhealthy people, but additional programmes are likely needed to protect vulnerable groups during severe recessions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic illness; Disability; Employment protection; Recession

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442371     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Cross-Country Comparison Model for Labor Participation (CCC Model for LP) of Persons with Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Angelique de Rijk; Karina Carrasco-Negüe; Inge Houkes
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Policy Guidelines for Effective Inclusion and Reintegration of People with Chronic Diseases in the Workplace: National and European Perspectives.

Authors:  Anastasia Vlachou; Panayiota Stavroussi; Olga Roka; Evdokia Vasilou; Dimitra Papadimitriou; Chiara Scaratti; Asel Kadyrbaeva; Klemens Fheodoroff; Valentina Brecelj; Olga Svestkova; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Jon Erik Finnvold; Sonja Gruber; Matilde Leonardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Social Quality and Health: Examining Individual and Neighbourhood Contextual Effects Using a Multilevel Modelling Approach.

Authors:  Daniel Holman; Alan Walker
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  Health-related educational inequalities in paid employment across 26 European countries in 2005-2014: repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jolinda L D Schram; Merel Schuring; Karen M Oude Hengel; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Does reduced employment protection increase the employment disadvantage of workers with low education and poorer health?

Authors:  Merel Schuring; Suzan J W Robroek; Ludovico Carrino; Anouk C O'Prinsen; Karen M Oude Hengel; Mauricio Avendano; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Unemployment and health selection in diverging economic conditions: Compositional changes? Evidence from 28 European countries.

Authors:  Kristian Heggebø; Espen Dahl
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-11-04

7.  What is the impact of flexicurity on the chances of entry into employment for people with low education and activity limitations due to health problems? A comparison of 21 European countries using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).

Authors:  Mona C Backhans; Sarah Mosedale; Daniel Bruce; Margaret Whitehead; Bo Burström
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Success and failure in narrowing the disability employment gap: comparing levels and trends across Europe 2002-2014.

Authors:  Ben Baumberg Geiger; Kjetil A van der Wel; Anne Grete Tøge
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Long term unemployment, income, poverty, and social public expenditure, and their relationship with self-perceived health in Spain (2007-2011).

Authors:  M Puerto López Del Amo González; Vivian Benítez; José J Martín-Martín
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods.

Authors:  Janice Lee; Ashley Schram; Emily Riley; Patrick Harris; Fran Baum; Matt Fisher; Toby Freeman; Sharon Friel
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.