Literature DB >> 25442166

Psychosocial factors in sports injury rehabilitation and return to play.

Leslie Podlog1, John Heil2, Stefanie Schulte3.   

Abstract

This article discusses the principles and practices that guide psychological intervention with injury, and encourages a psychological approach to injury for clinicians. Part 1 reviews the research literature, and serves as a foundation for the review of clinical practices in part 2. Examination of the research literature highlights 4 areas: (1) psychological factors influencing rehabilitation, (2) social factors affecting rehabilitation, (3) performance concerns among returning athletes, and (4) tools/inventories for assessing psychological readiness to return. A synopsis of an injury intervention plan is provided, and the influence of pain and fear in the rehabilitation process is described.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitions; Denial; Distress; Fear of injury; Intervention plan; Pain; Social support

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25442166     DOI： 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am        ISSN： 1047-9651            Impact factor:   1.784


  15 in total

1.  The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management.

Authors:  Howard Leventhal; L Alison Phillips; Edith Burns
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-11

2.  Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Eamonn Delahunt; Michelle Smith; Bill Vicenzino; Evert Verhagen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Which Functional Tests and Self-Reported Questionnaires Can Help Clinicians Make Valid Return to Sport Decisions in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability? A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion.

Authors:  Brice Picot; Alexandre Hardy; Romain Terrier; Bruno Tassignon; Ronny Lopes; François Fourchet
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Individualized Exercise Prescription for Athletes Using a Construct-Based Model.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus; Samantha Ray Hegedus; Alexis Wright; Tara Dickson; Benjamin D Stern
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Concussion under-reporting and pressure from coaches, teammates, fans, and parents.

Authors:  Emily Kroshus; Bernice Garnett; Matt Hawrilenko; Christine M Baugh; Jerel P Calzo
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Concussion reporting behaviours of community college student-athletes and limits of transferring concussion knowledge during the stress of competition.

Authors:  Nancy Resendes Chinn; Paul Porter
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2016-08-31

7.  Negative psychological responses of injury and rehabilitation adherence effects on return to play in competitive athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Ivarsson; Ulrika Tranaeus; Urban Johnson; Andreas Stenling
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2017-03-09

8.  Collegiate Athletes' Perceptions of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment.

Authors:  Samuel Ofei-Dodoo; Julia L Black; Michael A Kirkover; Colin B Lisenby; Andrew S T Porter; Paul M Cleland
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-06-25

9.  Effect of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in Increasing Pain Tolerance and Improving the Mental Health of Injured Athletes.

Authors:  Warhel Asim Mohammed; Athanasios Pappous; Dinkar Sharma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Resilience, stress and injuries in the context of the Brazilian elite rhythmic gymnastics.

Authors:  Renan Codonhato; Victor Rubio; Paulo Márcio Pereira Oliveira; Camila Ferezin Resende; Bruna Akawana Martins Rosa; Constanza Pujals; Lenamar Fiorese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.