Literature DB >> 25442084

Early metal stent insertion fails to prevent stricturing after single-stage complete Barrett's excision for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer.

Bronte A Holt1, Vanoo Jayasekeran2, Stephen J Williams2, Eric Y T Lee2, Farzan F Bahin2, Rebecca Sonson2, Reginald V Lord3, Michael J Bourke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) can be effectively treated by single-session EMR, resulting in complete Barrett's excision (CBE). CBE provides accurate histology for staging and clinical confirmation of neoplasia eradication but is limited by a high risk of esophageal stricture formation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic temporary esophageal stenting to prevent post-CBE stricture formation. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Single-center, investigator-initiated feasibility study. PATIENTS: Circumferential, short-segment Barrett's esophagus (≤C3≤M5) with HGD or IMC. INTERVENTION: Single-stage CBE and insertion of a fully covered metal esophageal stent at 10 days that was removed at 8 weeks. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 surveillance endoscopies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Symptomatic esophageal stricture formation.
RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, 8 patients (57.1%) required esophageal dilation for symptomatic CBE-related (n = 7) or stent-related (n = 4) strictures. A median of 3 surveillance endoscopies were performed over a median endoscopic follow-up of 17 months (range 4-25 months). Single-stage CBE successfully eliminated Barrett's intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia in 71.4% and 92.9% of patients, respectively. Four patients were admitted to the hospital, and 4 patients had early stent removal because of pain or dysphagia. LIMITATIONS: Single-center feasibility study.
CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study evaluating prophylactic esophageal stent insertion after single-stage CBE, esophageal strictures formed in more than of half the study cohort, and stents were associated with significant morbidity. An alternative method to reduce stricture formation is required. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01554280.).
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442084     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  3 in total

1.  Oral steroid prophylaxis is effective in preventing esophageal strictures after large endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Ratone; Erwan Bories; Fabrice Caillol; Christian Pesenti; Sebastien Godat; Flora Poizat; Chiara De Cassan; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-06

2.  Management of esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection for early neoplasia.

Authors:  Einas Abou Ali; Arthur Belle; Rachel Hallit; Benoit Terris; Frédéric Beuvon; Mahaut Leconte; Anthony Dohan; Sarah Leblanc; Solène Dermine; Lola-Jade Palmieri; Romain Coriat; Stanislas Chaussade; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Local injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) prevents scarring esophageal stricture caused by electrocautery in rabbit models.

Authors:  Ke Meng; Lei Shen; Yan Li; Jing Wen; Qingsen Liu; Xiaomei Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.