Yuan-Hong Gao1, Jun-Zhong Lin2, Xin An3, Jie-Lin Luo2, Mu-Yan Cai4, Pei-Qiang Cai5, Ling-Heng Kong2, Guo-Chen Liu2, Jing-Hua Tang2, Gong Chen2, Zhi-Zhong Pan2, Pei-Rong Ding6. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 5. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 6. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: dingpr@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Systemic failure remains the major challenge in management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To optimize the timing of neoadjuvant treatment and enhance systemic control, we initiated a phase 2 trial to evaluate a new strategy of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment, integrating induction chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation therapy, and consolidation chemotherapy. Here, we present preliminary results of this trial, reporting the tumor response, toxicities, and surgical complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients with LARC were enrolled, among which were two patients who were ineligible because of distant metastases before treatment. Patients were treated first with one cycle of induction chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m² on day 1, with capecitabine, 1000 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks (the XELOX regimen), followed by chemoradiation therapy, 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with the modified XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m²), and then with another cycle of consolidation chemotherapy with the XELOX regimen. Surgery was performed 6 to 8 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. Tumor responses, toxicities, and surgical complications were recorded. RESULTS: All but one patent completed the planned schedule of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment. Neither life-threatening blood count decrease nor febrile neutropenia were observed. Forty-five patents underwent optimal surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME). Four patients refused surgery because of clinically complete response. There was no perioperative mortality in this cohort. Five patients (11.1%) developed postoperative complications. Among the 45 patients who underwent TME, pathologic complete response (pCR), pCR or major regression, and at least moderate regression were achieved in 19 (42.2%), 37 (82.2%), and 44 patients (97.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the strategy of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment using XELOX regimen as induction, concomitant, and consolidation chemotherapy to the conventional radiation is well tolerated. The strategy is highly effective in terms of pCR and major regression, which warrants further investigation.
PURPOSE: Systemic failure remains the major challenge in management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To optimize the timing of neoadjuvant treatment and enhance systemic control, we initiated a phase 2 trial to evaluate a new strategy of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment, integrating induction chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation therapy, and consolidation chemotherapy. Here, we present preliminary results of this trial, reporting the tumor response, toxicities, and surgical complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients with LARC were enrolled, among which were two patients who were ineligible because of distant metastases before treatment. Patients were treated first with one cycle of induction chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m² on day 1, with capecitabine, 1000 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks (the XELOX regimen), followed by chemoradiation therapy, 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with the modified XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m²), and then with another cycle of consolidation chemotherapy with the XELOX regimen. Surgery was performed 6 to 8 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. Tumor responses, toxicities, and surgical complications were recorded. RESULTS: All but one patent completed the planned schedule of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment. Neither life-threatening blood count decrease nor febrile neutropenia were observed. Forty-five patents underwent optimal surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME). Four patients refused surgery because of clinically complete response. There was no perioperative mortality in this cohort. Five patients (11.1%) developed postoperative complications. Among the 45 patients who underwent TME, pathologic complete response (pCR), pCR or major regression, and at least moderate regression were achieved in 19 (42.2%), 37 (82.2%), and 44 patients (97.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that the strategy of neoadjuvant sandwich treatment using XELOX regimen as induction, concomitant, and consolidation chemotherapy to the conventional radiation is well tolerated. The strategy is highly effective in terms of pCR and major regression, which warrants further investigation.
Authors: Oliver S Chow; Deborah Kuk; Metin Keskin; J Joshua Smith; Niedzica Camacho; Raphael Pelossof; Chin-Tung Chen; Zhenbin Chen; Karin Avila; Martin R Weiser; Michael F Berger; Sujata Patil; Emily Bergsland; Julio Garcia-Aguilar Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Chang Woo Kim; Byung Mo Kang; Ik Yong Kim; Ji Yeon Kim; Sun Jin Park; Won Cheol Park; Ki Beom Bae; Byung-Noe Bae; Seong Kyu Baek; Seung Hyuk Baik; Gyung Mo Son; Yoon Suk Lee; Suk-Hwan Lee Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.430