Literature DB >> 25441672

Vascular reconstruction plays an important role in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Michael D Sgroi1, Raja R Narayan1, John S Lane1, Aram Demirjian1, Nii-Kabu Kabutey1, Roy M Fujitani1, David K Imagawa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have proved the feasibility of performing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation) in patients with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein and hepatic artery invasion. We report our institutional experience with the use of a variety of vascular reconstructive methods during pancreatic resections for adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed identifying all patients undergoing a Whipple operation or total pancreatectomy procedure from January 2003 to December 2013. All venous (portal vein-superior mesenteric vein) and arterial (superior mesenteric artery-hepatic artery) reconstructions were extracted and reviewed to determine survival and perioperative complications.
RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 270 Whipple and total pancreatectomy procedures were performed, of which 183 were for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Of the 183 operations, a total of 60 (32.8%) vascular reconstructions were found, 49 venous and 11 arterial. Venous reconstruction included 37 (61.7%) primary repairs, four (6.7%) reconstructions with CryoVein (CryoLife, Inc, Kennesaw, Ga), three (5.0%) repairs with autologous vein patch, three (5.0%) autologous saphenous reconstructions, and two (3.33%) portacaval shunts. In addition, there were 11 (18.3%) arterial reconstructions (seven hepatic artery and four superior mesenteric artery). The 1-year survival for all reconstructions was 71.1%, which is equivalent to T3 lesions that did not receive vascular reconstruction (70.11%), with a median survival time of 575.28 days and 12 patients still alive. Survival time was comparable with each type of venous reconstruction, averaging 528 days (11 of 49 patients still alive). There was a total thrombosis rate of seven of 60 (11.6%), all of which were portal vein thrombosis: three in the primary repair group and four delayed thromboses seen in primary repair, CryoVein repair, and vein patch repair. There was no thrombosis in any patients after arterial reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive approach for stage II pancreatic cancers with venous or arterial invasion can be performed with comparable results when it is executed by an experienced institution with skilled oncologic and vascular surgeons.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441672     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  An Improved Staging System for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Critical Need in the Multidisciplinary Era.

Authors:  Marc W Fromer; Jenci Hawthorne; Prejesh Philips; Michael E Egger; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Explicit vascular reconstruction based on adjacent vector projection.

Authors:  Shaode Yu; Shibin Wu; Zhicheng Zhang; Yili Chen; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 3.  Bioprinting of freestanding vascular grafts and the regulatory considerations for additively manufactured vascular prostheses.

Authors:  Sara Abdollahi; Joseph Boktor; Narutoshi Hibino
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  Cold-stored cadaveric venous allograft for superior mesenteric/portal vein reconstruction during pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Dyre Kleive; Audun E Berstad; Caroline S Verbeke; Sven P Haugvik; Ivar P Gladhaug; Pål-Dag Line; Knut J Labori
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Classification and techniques of en bloc venous reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Farzad Alemi; Flavio G Rocha; William S Helton; Thomas Biehl; Adnan Alseidi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Hepatic Artery Reconstruction with a Continuous Suture Method for Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Shimpei Otsuka; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shunsuke Onoe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Segmental portal/superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with the iliac vein after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Li-Xin Li; Hua Fan; Jian-Tao Kou; Xian-Liang Li; Ren Lang; Qiang He
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection favors the survival time of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Bo Xie; Ji Li; Ji-Chun Gu; Chen Jin; Cai-Feng Zou; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Chen; Xing Wang; Hao Zhang; Xu-Bao Liu; Chun-Lu Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Cattell-Braasch maneuver combined with local hypothermia during superior mesenteric artery resection in pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Sofia Westermark; Elena Rangelova; Christoph Ansorge; Lars Lundell; Ralf Segersvärd; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.