Literature DB >> 25441461

Enhancing social networks: a qualitative study of health and social care practice in UK mental health services.

Martin Webber1, Hannah Reidy, David Ansari, Martin Stevens, David Morris.   

Abstract

People with severe mental health problems such as psychosis have access to less social capital, defined as resources within social networks, than members of the general population. However, a lack of theoretically and empirically informed models hampers the development of social interventions which seek to enhance an individual's social networks. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study, which used ethnographic field methods in six sites in England to investigate how workers helped people recovering from psychosis to enhance their social networks. This study drew upon practice wisdom and lived experience to provide data for intervention modelling. Data were collected from 73 practitioners and 51 people who used their services in two phases. Data were selected and coded using a grounded theory approach to depict the key themes that appeared to underpin the generation of social capital within networks. Findings are presented in four over-arching themes - worker skills, attitudes and roles; connecting people processes; role of the agency; and barriers to network development. The sub-themes which were identified included worker attitudes; person-centred approach; equality of worker-individual relationship; goal setting; creating new networks and relationships; engagement through activities; practical support; existing relationships; the individual taking responsibility; identifying and overcoming barriers; and moving on. Themes were consistent with recovery models used within mental health services and will provide the basis for the development of an intervention model to enhance individuals' access to social capital within networks.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mental health; recovery; social capital; social intervention; social networks; social work

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441461     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  3 in total

1.  Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery).

Authors:  Michael Coffey; Ben Hannigan; Alan Meudell; Julian Hunt; Deb Fitzsimmons
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Community-Enhanced Social Prescribing: Integrating Community in Policy and Practice.

Authors:  David Morris; Paul Thomas; Julie Ridley; Martin Webber
Journal:  Int J Community Wellbeing       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  The Impact of Austerity on Mental Health Service Provision: A UK Perspective.

Authors:  Ian Cummins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.