Literature DB >> 25440749

Midface implants: surgical and nonsurgical alternatives.

Diya Tantawi1, Seth Eberlin2, Jay Calvert3.   

Abstract

The midface has suffered vigorous challenges in terms of rejuvenation techniques over the years. A variety of alternatives are available for facial skeletal and soft tissue volume enhancement. No technique is ideal in every patient. After a thorough facial analysis, the surgeon must consider the advantages and disadvantages of implant-based volume enhancement in the context of each individual patient to determine the most appropriate option. Computer modeling provides improved methods to assess volumetric changes to augment and restore the facial volume. It is our belief that the multiple planes of dissection offered by the midface also allow us to redrape the soft tissues 3-dimensionally and continue to offer the consistency and longevity with implant-based midface rejuvenation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic surgical procedures; Facial aging; Facial implants; Facial rejuvenation; Midface implants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25440749     DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  1 in total

1.  Nasolabial Sulcus Rejuvenation: Paranasal Augmentation Using a Folded Dermal Graft.

Authors:  Soo Hyang Lee; Ki Pyo Sung; Sean Kim; Heung-Kyu Kim
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.