Literature DB >> 25440470

The relationship between the contralateral collateral supply and myocardial viability on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: can the angiogram predict functional recovery?

David P Ripley1, Oliver E Gosling1, Loke Bhatia2, Charles R Peebles2, Angela C Shore3, Nick Curzen2, Nick G Bellenger4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A collateral circulation which supplies a myocardial territory, subtended by a chronic total occlusion (CTO), may be observed at invasive coronary angiography. The prognostic and protective role of such collateralisation is well demonstrated suggesting that a good collateral circulation may be a predictor of myocardial viability, but current evidence is discrepant. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between collateralisation from the contralateral epicardial vessels and myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
METHOD: Consecutive patients with CTO having had both CMR and invasive coronary angiography were retrospectively identified. The collateral circulation was graded with the Cohen and Rentrop classification. CMR images were graded per segment for wall motion (1: normal/hyperkinetic, 2: hypokinetic, 3: akinetic, or 4: dyskinetic) and wall motion score index (WMSI) was calculated. The segmental transmurality of late gadolinium enhancement was scored as 1 (0%), 2 (1-25%), 3 (26-50%), 4 (51-75%) and 5 (76-100%).
RESULTS: A good collateral circulation was more likely to supply viable myocardium (p=0.01). There was no relationship between collateral circulation supply and wall motion score index (WMSI), however, increasing transmurality of LGE was significantly associated with higher mean WMSI representing increasing dysfunctional myocardium (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The presence of collateral coronary circulation at angiography predicts the presence of viability on cardiovascular MRI, with a gradation of greater viability associated with improving Rentrop grade. A collateral circulation at angiography should, therefore, prompt more formal assessment of viability and consideration of revascularisation in order for the patient to obtain the associated functional and prognostic improvement.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic total occlusion; Collateral circulation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Viability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440470     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  8 in total

1.  The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on left ventricular function and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Georgios E Christakopoulos; Muhammad Nauman J Tarar; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Can the degree of coronary collateralization be used in clinical routine as a valid angiographic parameter of viability?

Authors:  Maja Pirnat; Arthur E Stillman; Rainer Rienmueller; Marko Noc; Mario Gorenjak; Tomaž Šeruga
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Relationship of myocardial hibernation, scar, and angiographic collateral flow in ischemic cardiomyopathy with coronary chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Li Wang; Min-Jie Lu; Lei Feng; Juan Wang; Wei Fang; Zuo-Xiang He; Ke-Fei Dou; Shi-Hua Zhao; Min-Fu Yang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Value of Hybrid Imaging with PET/CT to Guide Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion.

Authors:  Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Pieter G Raijmakers; Roel S Driessen; Niels van Royen; Alexander Nap; Albert C van Rossum; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015

5.  Stimulation of Collateral Vessel Growth by Inhibition of Galectin 2 in Mice Using a Single-Domain Llama-Derived Antibody.

Authors:  Maurits R Hollander; Matthijs F Jansen; Luuk H G A Hopman; Edward Dolk; Peter M van de Ven; Paul Knaapen; Anton J Horrevoets; Esther Lutgens; Niels van Royen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Is what you see what you get?

Authors:  M H Stewart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion With Well-Developed Collaterals.

Authors:  Se Yeon Choi; Byoung Geol Choi; Seung-Woon Rha; Man Jong Baek; Yang Gi Ryu; Yoonjee Park; Jae Kyeong Byun; Minsuk Shim; Hu Li; Ahmed Mashaly; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Jah Yeon Choi; Eun Jin Park; Jin Oh Na; Cheol Ung Choi; Hong Euy Lim; Eung Ju Kim; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo; Dong Joo Oh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Impact of coronary collateralization on long-term clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Zhen Kun Yang; Ying Shen; Yang Dai; Xiao Qun Wang; Jian Hu; Feng Hua Ding; Rui Yan Zhang; Lin Lu; Wei Feng Shen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 9.951

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.