Literature DB >> 25440158

The durability of abatacept as a first and subsequent biologic and improvement in HAQ from a large multi-site real-world study.

Janet E Pope1, Emmanouil Rampakakis2, John Sampalis3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the effectiveness of newer biologics such as abatacept is essential in real-world practice.
METHODS: RA patients administered infusions of abatacept via the Orencia Response Program network with at least one follow-up evaluation were included. The number needed to treat (NNT) to improve HAQ by at least the minimal clinically important difference (MID ≥ 0.22) and abatacept survival and differences between biologic-naïve and TNFi-experienced patients were assessed.
RESULTS: Among 2929 patients enrolled, 1771 (60.5%) were eligible for analysis (mean age was 57.6 years, disease duration was 16.5 ± 11.0 (SD) years, 77.2% were female, and 79.2% had past TNFi), with mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 12.3 (SD) months. Half had comorbidities including hypertension (17%), diabetes (8.4%), asthma (6.0%), hypothyroidism (5.7%), and hyperlipidemia (4.0%). Mean (SE) durability of treatment was 26.8 (0.53) months, where 66% were receiving abatacept at 12 months and 53% at 24 months. Patient survival was longer where abatacept was the first biologic vs. post-TNFi (P = 0.0001). In the use of abatacept as a first biologic, 70% achieved MID in HAQ vs. 71% if post-TNFi (P = 0.65) with NNT to improve one patient with at least MID of HAQ was 1.4.
CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept is effective in improving HAQ in RA both pre and post first biologic in real-world patients with comorbidities. For those still on abatacept, HAQ continued to improve over the first 2 years. The durability of abatacept is better as a first biologic, but NNT to improve HAQ patients on treatment is the same post-DMARDs and post-TNFi. For treatment durability and HAQ MID achievement, abatacept use as a first biologic is better.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abatacept; Cohort; Comorbidities; Database; Durability; First biologic; Function; HAQ; Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index; Number needed to treat (NNT); Post-TNFi; Real-world practice; Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440158     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

1.  Current concepts on the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes--considerations for attempts to prevent and reverse the disease.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Matthias von Herrath; Alvin C Powers; Michael Clare-Salzler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Abatacept improves whole-body insulin sensitivity in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.

Authors:  Francesco Ursini; Emilio Russo; Marta Letizia Hribal; Daniele Mauro; Francesca Savarino; Caterina Bruno; Cesare Tripolino; Mariangela Rubino; Saverio Naty; Rosa Daniela Grembiale
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  Co-stimulation Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Today and Tomorrow.

Authors:  Michael Schiff
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept: a UK multi-centre observational study.

Authors:  Ernest Choy; Lara Groves; Daniel Sugrue; Michael Hurst; John Houghton; Srinivasan Venkatachalam; Yusuf I Patel; James R Maxwell; Kevin G Pollock; Sadie Henning
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 5.  Immune-Mediated Diseases from the Point of View of Psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology.

Authors:  Miguel A Ortega; Cielo García-Montero; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon; Ana Maria Gómez-Lahoz; Guillermo Lahera; Jorge Monserrat; Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez; Javier Quintero; Melchor Álvarez-Mon
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.