Literature DB >> 25440133

Calcaneal robusticity in Plio-Pleistocene hominins: implications for locomotor diversity and phylogeny.

Thomas C Prang1.   

Abstract

A key pedal adaptation to bipedality is a relatively large, weight-bearing calcaneus. The earliest evidence for a human-like, robust calcaneus is at 3.2 Ma in Australopithecus afarensis (A.L. 333-8, A.L. 333-55, A.L. 333-37) from Hadar, Ethiopia. Australopithecus sediba at 1.98 Ma from Malapa, South Africa displays a unique combination of primitive australopith features and more derived Homo-like features, but surprisingly is characterized by a gracile, chimpanzee-like calcaneus. The differences in calcaneal morphology suggest that these taxa differed in the frequency of arboreality and in the manner of foot function during terrestrial bipedal locomotion. This study examines calcaneal morphology in extant hominids (i.e., great apes and humans; N = 95) and fossil hominins (N = 5) to better understand the evolutionary development of calcaneal robusticity in early hominins. In particular, this study focuses on two additional fossil hominin calcanei that have not figured prominently in previous discussions of calcaneal robusticity: StW 352 and Omo 33-74-896. A measure of calcaneal robusticity was quantified as the ratio of calcaneal tuber cross-sectional area to calcaneal tuber length, which significantly differs between humans and non-humans using a sequential Bonferroni alpha adjustment for multiple comparisons. Additional multivariate analyses using Mosimann shape variables show that StW 352 and Omo 33-74-896 are more similar to Au. sediba in calcaneal tuber morphology than to Au. afarensis, suggesting that the latter taxon is better adapted for terrestrial bipedalism than at least some later species of Australopithecus. This finding implies the possibility of several complex evolutionary scenarios involving either multiple reversals in postcranial morphology in Australopithecus or the independent acquisition of adaptations to terrestrial bipedalism in Au. afarensis and Homo. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australopithecus; Bipedalism; Foot evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440133     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  4 in total

1.  New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back.

Authors:  Scott A Williams; Thomas Cody Prang; Marc R Meyer; Thierra K Nalley; Renier Van Der Merwe; Christopher Yelverton; Daniel García-Martínez; Gabrielle A Russo; Kelly R Ostrofsky; Jeffrey Spear; Jennifer Eyre; Mark Grabowski; Shahed Nalla; Markus Bastir; Peter Schmid; Steven E Churchill; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Rearfoot posture of Australopithecus sediba and the evolution of the hominin longitudinal arch.

Authors:  Thomas C Prang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A nearly complete foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and its implications for the ontogeny and function of Australopithecus afarensis.

Authors:  Jeremy M DeSilva; Corey M Gill; Thomas C Prang; Miriam A Bredella; Zeresenay Alemseged
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Forward dynamic simulation of Japanese macaque bipedal locomotion demonstrates better energetic economy in a virtualised plantigrade posture.

Authors:  Hideki Oku; Naohiko Ide; Naomichi Ogihara
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.