Literature DB >> 25438986

Diagnosis of bladder tumours in patients with macroscopic haematuria: a prospective comparison of split-bolus computed tomography urography, magnetic resonance urography and flexible cystoscopy.

Karen L Gandrup1, Vibeke B Løgager, Thomas Bretlau, Jørgen Nordling, Henrik S Thomsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare split-bolus computed tomography urography (CTU), magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and flexible cystoscopy in patients with macroscopic haematuria regarding the diagnosis of bladder tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 150 patients underwent CTU, MRU and flexible cystoscopy. Two uroradiologists individually reviewed the images without any clinical information, using a questionnaire. Patient records and pathology reports were also reviewed.
RESULTS: At flexible cystoscopy, MRU and CTU, 32, 19 and 15 bladder lesions were identified, respectively. Histopathology showed that 13 of the 29 biopsied lesions were transitional cell carcinomas. Compared with the histopathology, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of tumours by CTU and MRU were 61.5% and 94.9%, and 79.9% and 93.4%, respectively. False-positive detection of bladder tumours, compared with histopathology, was reported in seven CTUs and nine MRUs, whereas the number of false-negative findings was five for CTUs and three for MRUs.
CONCLUSIONS: Split-bolus CTU or MRU cannot replace cystoscopy in cases of macroscopic haematuria. MRU has a higher sensitivity than split-bolus CTU, and is a potential alternative to flexible cystoscopy. Patients with a low risk of bladder cancer may forgo flexible cystoscopy if a bladder tumour is identified by either CTU or MRU, and proceed straight to transuretheral resection of the bladder.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; diagnostic imaging; haematuria; magnetic resonance imaging; urography.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25438986     DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2014.981203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of ureter: a primer for the emergency radiologist.

Authors:  Mohd Zahid; Pankaj Nepal; Arpit Nagar; Prem P Batchala; Devendra Kumar; Vijayanadh Ojili
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 2.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Diagnostic utility of axial imaging in the evaluation of hematuria: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Rashid K Sayyid; Roni Manyevitch; Nathan Perlis; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Neil E Fleshner; Martha K Terris; Matthew E Nielsen; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer, is it time to replace biopsy?

Authors:  Rima S Al Johi; Gehan S Seifeldein; Ahmed M Moeen; Noha A Aboulhagag; Ehab M Moussa; Diaa A Hameed; Hisham M Imam
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-01-16

5.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.