| Literature DB >> 25438712 |
Marjan van Hezewijk1, Dennis J F Smit2, Esther Bastiaannet2, Astrid N Scholten3, Gemma M C Ranke2, Judith R Kroep4, Corrie A M Marijnen3, Cornelis J H van de Velde2.
Abstract
As the number of breast cancer survivors increases, this study prospectively examined whether tailored follow-up with differentiated number of visits per risk group, based on a prognostic index for local recurrence, is feasible and acceptable for patients and professionals. Between March 2007 and March 2010, 180 breast cancer patients (pT1-2N0-2cM0) were included. Primary endpoint was feasibility of tailored follow-up, based on the number of follow-up visits, patient satisfaction, anxiety and attitude towards follow-up. Secondary endpoints were reasons for visits, incidence, time to detection of local recurrences and the use of alternative care. In the second and third year of follow-up, the results show a 22% reduction in visits per patient in the low-risk group compared to the intermediate-risk group; 2.8 versus 3.6 visits. The majority of interval visits in both groups was initiated by the professional. No significant differences were found in attitude towards follow-up, patient satisfaction, anxiety and depression, alternative health care use or local recurrences between the risk groups. In conclusion, implementation of a tailored follow-up programme with decreased number of visits for low-risk patients is feasible and acceptable to patients. Appointing one coordinating professional, possibly a nurse practitioner, could further reduce the number of follow-up visits.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Follow-up; Locoregional recurrence; Patient satisfaction
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25438712 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast ISSN: 0960-9776 Impact factor: 4.380