Literature DB >> 25438685

Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance.

Gökhan Pekel1, Semra Acer2, Fatih Ozbakis2, Ramazan Yagci2, Nihat Sayin3.   

Abstract

Sighting ocular dominance is the preference of one eye over the other in terms of sighting. In this study, our aim was to examine differences in interocular and intraocular macular thickness, interocular fovea-optic disc angle, and foveal blood vessel asymmetries associated with sighting ocular dominance. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy young adults were included in this prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Sighting ocular dominance was determined by a hole-in-the-card test. Macular thickness measurements were taken and posterior pole asymmetry analysis conducted with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The optic disc-fovea angle and visible foveal blood vessel counts were calculated by using the posterior pole retinal images of optical coherence tomography. The mean age of the participants was 27.3 (standard deviation [SD] 6.6) years. There were 20 males and 25 females. The mean total macular area thickness, and mean macular thickness of the superior and inferior hemispheres of the dominant and nondominant eyes were similar (p > 0.05). Macular asymmetry analysis revealed no statistically significant interocular difference (p > 0.05). In the dominant eyes, the mean optic disc-fovea angle was 5.24° (SD 1.77), whereas it was 5.49° (SD 2.58) in the nondominant eyes (p = 0.51). The number of visible blood vessels passing through the fovea was similar in the dominant and nondominant eyes (p > 0.05). These results suggested that interocular and intraocular macular thickness differences, interocular fovea-optic disc angle differences, and number of visible foveal blood vessels are not associated with sighting ocular dominance.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foveal blood vessels; Fovea–optic disc angle; Macular thickness; Posterior pole asymmetry; Sighting ocular dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25438685     DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of subjective cyclofusion ranges and objective ocular torsion in normal participants according to age.

Authors:  Manami Kawai; Toshiaki Goseki; Takashi Okano; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Interleaved Optical Coherence Tomography: Clinical and Laboratory Biomarkers in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Authors:  Corina-Iuliana Suciu; Vlad-Ioan Suciu; Ancuţa Cuţaş; Simona Delia Nicoară
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Posterior Pole Asymmetry Analysis in the Children with Anisometropia.

Authors:  Sezin Akca Bayar; Almila Sarigul Sezenoz; Sibel Oto
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Optic Disc - Fovea Angle: The Beijing Eye Study 2011.

Authors:  Rahul A Jonas; Ya Xing Wang; Hua Yang; Jian Jun Li; Liang Xu; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.