Literature DB >> 25438679

Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening?

Levent Sahin1, Murat Bozkurt2, Hilal Sahin3, Aykut Gürel4, Ayse Ender Yumru5.   

Abstract

To select cytogenetically normal embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) aneuploidy screening (AS) is used in numerous centers around the world. Chromosomal abnormalities lead to developmental problems, implantation failure, and early abortion of embryos. The usefulness of PGD in identifying single-gene diseases, human leukocyte antigen typing, X-linked diseases, and specific genetic diseases is well-known. In this review, preimplantation embryo genetics, PGD research studies, and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium studies and reports are examined. In addition, criteria for embryo selection, technical aspects of PGD-AS, and potential noninvasive embryo selection methods are described. Indications for PGD and possible causes of discordant PGD results between the centers are discussed. The limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization, and the advantages of the array comparative genomic hybridization are included in this review. Although PGD-AS for patients of advanced maternal age has been shown to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes in some studies, to our knowledge, there is not sufficient evidence to use advanced maternal age as the sole indication for PGD-AS. PGD-AS might be harmful and may not increase the success rates of in vitro fertilization. At the same time PGD, is not recommended for recurrent implantation failure and unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Chromosomal anomalies; In vitro fertilization; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25438679     DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Asymmetric Contribution of Blastomere Lineages of First Division of the Zygote to Entire Human Body Using Post-Zygotic Variants.

Authors:  Seong Gyu Kwon; Geon Hue Bae; June Hyug Choi; Nanda Maya Mali; Mee Sook Jun; Dong Sun Kim; Man-Hoon Han; Seongyeol Park; Young Seok Ju; Seock Hwan Choi; Ji Won Oh
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.451

2.  Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Alison Coates; Brandon J Bankowski; Allen Kung; Darren K Griffin; Santiago Munne
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Association between clinical and IVF laboratory parameters and miscarriage after single euploid embryo transfers.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Nogales; María Cruz; Silvia de Frutos; Eva María Martínez; María Gaytán; Marta Ariza; Fernando Bronet; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Alina Caragia; Alessia Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.